Effects of vibratory stimulation on muscular pain threshold and blink response in human subjects. 1986

Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
Istituto Interfacoltà di Fisiologia Università degli Studi, 50134 FlorenceItaly Istituto di Clinica Medico III, Università degli Studi, 50134 FlorenceItaly.

The effects of vibratory stimulation on muscular pain threshold were investigated in 28 healthy subjects. Pain sensation was evaluated by the subjects' verbal reports in response to electrical stimulation of the vastus medialis muscle. Concomitant variations of blink response evoked as a component of the startle reaction were also studied. In all the subjects tested, high frequency vibration (110 Hz) induced a marked and long lasting elevation of the muscular pain threshold but only when vibration was applied to the skin overlying the ipsilateral quadriceps tendon or neighbouring areas and not when applied to remote ipsi- or contralateral regions. This effect was prevented either when tonic vibration reflex (TVR) of the quadriceps muscle was elicited or the skin underlying the vibrator was anaesthetized. Vibratory stimulation at low frequency (30 Hz) failed to produce any consistent effect on muscular pain threshold. Variations in threshold for blink response, as a rule, closely followed those of muscular pain threshold. However, a facilitation of the blink response, not accompanied by changes in pain sensation, was observed during the first period of both high and low frequency vibratory stimulation. The effectiveness of high frequency vibration in raising the muscular pain threshold is coherent with previous results showing that vibration is able to affect pain sensation. Present results suggest a role for rapidly adapting receptors (RA) and/or pacinian corpuscles (PC) in this effect and support the hypothesis of an inhibition of nociceptive messages, possibly at spinal segmental levels, by volleys in large myelinated afferent fibres.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007839 Functional Laterality Behavioral manifestations of cerebral dominance in which there is preferential use and superior functioning of either the left or the right side, as in the preferred use of the right hand or right foot. Ambidexterity,Behavioral Laterality,Handedness,Laterality of Motor Control,Mirror Writing,Laterality, Behavioral,Laterality, Functional,Mirror Writings,Motor Control Laterality,Writing, Mirror,Writings, Mirror
D008297 Male Males
D009132 Muscles Contractile tissue that produces movement in animals. Muscle Tissue,Muscle,Muscle Tissues,Tissue, Muscle,Tissues, Muscle
D010146 Pain An unpleasant sensation induced by noxious stimuli which are detected by NERVE ENDINGS of NOCICEPTIVE NEURONS. Suffering, Physical,Ache,Pain, Burning,Pain, Crushing,Pain, Migratory,Pain, Radiating,Pain, Splitting,Aches,Burning Pain,Burning Pains,Crushing Pain,Crushing Pains,Migratory Pain,Migratory Pains,Pains, Burning,Pains, Crushing,Pains, Migratory,Pains, Radiating,Pains, Splitting,Physical Suffering,Physical Sufferings,Radiating Pain,Radiating Pains,Splitting Pain,Splitting Pains,Sufferings, Physical
D001767 Blinking Brief closing of the eyelids by involuntary normal periodic closing, as a protective measure, or by voluntary action. Orbicularis Oculi Reflex,Reflex, Blink,Reflex, Corneal,Reflex, Orbicularis Oculi,Winking,Blink Reflexes,Corneal Reflexes,Orbicularis Oculi Reflexes,Blink Reflex,Reflexes, Blink,Reflexes, Orbicularis Oculi
D004558 Electric Stimulation Use of electric potential or currents to elicit biological responses. Stimulation, Electric,Electrical Stimulation,Electric Stimulations,Electrical Stimulations,Stimulation, Electrical,Stimulations, Electric,Stimulations, Electrical
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000779 Anesthetics, Local Drugs that block nerve conduction when applied locally to nerve tissue in appropriate concentrations. They act on any part of the nervous system and on every type of nerve fiber. In contact with a nerve trunk, these anesthetics can cause both sensory and motor paralysis in the innervated area. Their action is completely reversible. (From Gilman AG, et. al., Goodman and Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics, 8th ed) Nearly all local anesthetics act by reducing the tendency of voltage-dependent sodium channels to activate. Anesthetics, Conduction-Blocking,Conduction-Blocking Anesthetics,Local Anesthetic,Anesthetics, Topical,Anesthetic, Local,Anesthetics, Conduction Blocking,Conduction Blocking Anesthetics,Local Anesthetics,Topical Anesthetics

Related Publications

Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
April 1982, Acta physiologica Scandinavica,
Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
December 1991, Acta physiologica Scandinavica,
Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
January 1988, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine,
Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
September 1984, Pain,
Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
August 2017, Physiology & behavior,
Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
January 2005, Journal of rehabilitation research and development,
Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
December 2003, Chinese medical journal,
Tito Pantaleo, and Roberto Duranti, and Fabrizio Bellini
October 1981, British dental journal,
Copied contents to your clipboard!