-transparent.png){kind=logo}
We have examined the selectivity of rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EC 3.3.2.3) toward all of the possible positional isomers of benzo-ring diol epoxides and tetrahydroepoxides of benz[a]anthracene, as well as the 1,2-diol 3,4-epoxides of triphenylene. This set includes compounds with no bay region in the vicinity of the benzo-ring, a bay-region diol group, a bay-region epoxide group, and (for the triphenylene derivatives) both a bay-region diol and a bay-region epoxide. In all cases where both the tetrahydroepoxides and the corresponding diol epoxides were examined, there is a large retarding effect of hydroxyl substitution on the rate of the enzyme-catalyzed hydration. When the tetrahydroepoxides are fair or poor substrates (epoxide group in the 1,2-, 8,9-, or 10,11-position), the additional retardation introduced by adjacent hydroxyl groups causes the enzyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of the corresponding diol epoxides to be insignificantly slow or nonexistent. In contrast, a benz[a]anthracene derivative with an epoxide group in the 3,4-position, (-)-tetrahydrobenz[a]anthracene (3R,4S)-epoxide, has been identified as the best substrate known for epoxide hydrolase, with a Vmax at 37 degrees C and pH 8.4 of 6800 nmol/min/mg of protein, and the two diastereomeric (+/-)-benz[a]anthracene 1,2-diol 3,4-epoxides, unlike all the other diol epoxides examined to date, are moderately good substrates for epoxide hydrolase. This novel observation is accounted for by the fact that the very high reactivity of the tetrahydrobenz[a]anthracene 3,4-epoxide system towards epoxide hydrolase is large enough to overcome a kinetically unfavorable effect of hydroxyl substitution. The enantioselectivity and positional selectivity of the enzyme have been determined for the tetrahydro-1,2- and -3,4-epoxides of benz[a]anthracene as well as the 1,2-diol 3,4-epoxides. When the epoxide is located in the 3,4-position, the benzylic carbon is the preferred site of attack, whereas for the enantiomers of the bay-region tetrahydro-1,2-epoxides, the chemically less reactive non-benzylic carbon is preferred. The regio- and enantioselectivity of epoxide hydrolase are discussed in terms of a possible model for the hydrophobic binding site of this enzyme.
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
June 1978,
Cancer research,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
July 1977,
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
July 1979,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
August 1999,
The Journal of biological chemistry,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
January 1978,
Chemico-biological interactions,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
January 1981,
Methods in enzymology,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
December 1983,
Carcinogenesis,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
May 1981,
The Journal of biological chemistry,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
November 1979,
Biochemical and biophysical research communications,
J M Sayer, and
H Yagi, and
P J van Bladeren, and
W Levin, and
D M Jerina
September 1974,
Biochemical pharmacology,
