-transparent.png){kind=logo}
A double blind comparison of meglumine iodamide and Renografin-60 in bolus intravenous pyelography, using 50 ml of contrast or less, was conducted in 78 patients. Meglumine iodamide produced more dense opacifications, but it also produced a greater number of laboratory abnormalities. All were transient and mild. No serious abnormalities resulted from the use of either agent.
Related Publications
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
January 1977,
The Yale journal of biology and medicine,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
December 1967,
Journal of the Canadian Association of Radiologists,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
December 1968,
Journal of the Canadian Association of Radiologists,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
May 1985,
Australasian radiology,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
January 1973,
Radiology,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
November 1967,
Ceskoslovenska radiologie,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
April 1968,
Radiology,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
September 1962,
Radiology,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
January 1974,
Investigative radiology,
S G Gerzof, and
A H Robbins, and
G Unger, and
A Zaki, and
E A Wickis
February 1968,
Nihon Hinyokika Gakkai zasshi. The japanese journal of urology,
