-transparent.png){kind=logo}
A method for evaluating processing variability as well as quantitative data on a quality assurance program tested at a radiology department are presented. Thirty per cent of all retakes due to improper overall density could be attributed to processing variation; these could be prevented through a QA program which is highly cost-effective in both monetary and patient-care terms.
Related Publications
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
February 1960,
The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
June 1980,
QRB. Quality review bulletin,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
March 1981,
Pediatric dentistry,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
January 1979,
Dimensions in health service,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
January 1979,
Hospital pharmacy,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
January 2010,
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
January 1980,
Radiologic technology,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
May 1986,
Hospital materiel management quarterly,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
February 1992,
Gastroenterology,
L Goldman, and
J J Vucich, and
S Beech, and
W L Murphy
September 1977,
The Nursing clinics of North America,
