A simple method of boxing rubber base impressions. 1983

K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle

The advantages of boxing an impression are better adaptation of stone around dowel pins, control over the level of the second pour of stone, and minimal cast trimming. This article describes a simplified boxing technique that offers the following additional advantages: Parts of the impression that are inadequate in length can be extended to ensure a die of adequate length (Fig. 6). Boxmat adheres to the rubber base and facilitates application. Contouring the palatal or lingual part of the impression is greatly simplified and provides access for sawing out dies. The material is reusable.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D003760 Dental Impression Materials Substances used to create an impression, or negative reproduction, of the teeth and dental arches. These materials include dental plasters and cements, metallic oxide pastes, silicone base materials, or elastomeric materials. Dental Impression Material,Impression Material, Dental,Impression Materials, Dental,Material, Dental Impression,Materials, Dental Impression
D003761 Dental Impression Technique Procedure of producing an imprint or negative likeness of the teeth and/or edentulous areas. Impressions are made in plastic material which becomes hardened or set while in contact with the tissue. They are later filled with plaster of Paris or artificial stone to produce a facsimile of the oral structures present. Impressions may be made of a full complement of teeth, of areas where some teeth have been removed, or in a mouth from which all teeth have been extracted. (Illustrated Dictionary of Dentistry, 1982) Dental Impression Technic,Dental Impression Technics,Dental Impression Techniques,Impression Technic, Dental,Impression Technics, Dental,Impression Technique, Dental,Impression Techniques, Dental,Technic, Dental Impression,Technics, Dental Impression,Technique, Dental Impression,Techniques, Dental Impression

Related Publications

K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
October 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
February 1981, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
January 1971, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
November 1997, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
October 1968, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
December 1985, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
January 1985, General dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
June 1975, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
March 1975, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry,
K B Troendle, and E Cavazos, and G R Troendle
January 1971, Dental survey,
Copied contents to your clipboard!