The efficacy and safety of flecainide, 200 mg twice daily, was compared with disopyramide, 150 mg 4 times daily, in a randomized, double-blind, crossover study in 25 patients (19 men and 6 women, aged 20 to 71 years, mean 52.5) with more than 1,000 ventricular premature complexes (VPCs) in a pretrial 24-hour Holter monitoring screen. Each 14-day active treatment period was preceded and followed by a 7-day placebo period. Ambulatory ECGs were recorded at the end of each study week and analyzed blindly. Average VPCs recorded during each of the 2 active periods were compared with average VPCs in the placebo periods. Twenty-two of 25 patients attained therapeutic plasma levels of both drugs. The occurrence of VPCs was significantly less during flecainide than during disopyramide treatment, 92 and 39%, respectively (p less than 0.01). Complex arrhythmic events were significantly more suppressed with flecainide than with disopyramide. No difference was observed between the 2 drugs in the incidence or severity of reported side effects. PQ, QRS and QT intervals increased beyond normal limits on both drugs in some patients, significantly more with flecainide than with disopyramide. The JT interval did not change or decrease; hence, all changes in the QT interval were attributable to a widening of the QRS complex. Neither drug showed any significant effect on blood pressure or heart rate. Flecainide may be a well-tolerated and valuable alternative to currently available antiarrhythmic agents.