-transparent.png){kind=logo}
The diagnostic value of ultrasound and angiography is compared in 80 renal masses. Whereas the overall accuracy is approximately the same (95%), there are inherent limitations to both methods. As to sonography, the limiting factors consist of size, complex echopattern and lack of tissue distinction. Angiography, on the other hand, has its limitations in hypovascular tumors as well as in benign lesions simulating malignancy (abscess, hamartoma).
Related Publications
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
January 1980,
Acta medica Austriaca,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
October 1979,
RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
July 1981,
Der Urologe. Ausg. A,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
October 1976,
Annales de radiologie,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
May 1980,
RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
January 1979,
Chirurgie; memoires de l'Academie de chirurgie,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
October 1977,
Rinsho hoshasen. Clinical radiography,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
May 1981,
Rontgen-Blatter; Zeitschrift fur Rontgen-Technik und medizinisch-wissenschaftliche Photographie,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
November 1984,
European journal of radiology,
E Voegeli, and
R Kwasny, and
B Hofer
September 1978,
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica,
