-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Urography was performed with the non-ionic contrast medium iohexol in 21 children and with the ionic contrast medium metrizoate in 18 children. The quality of the urograms was good with both contrast media and there was no statistically significant difference between them in this respect. However, the contrast medium attenuation in the collecting system was higher with iohexol than with metrizoate. No renal damage was observed. Only minor adverse reactions were seen with both contrast media and more rarely in the iohexol group, but this difference was not statistically significant.
Related Publications
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
January 1983,
Neuroradiology,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
February 1989,
Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946),
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
February 1984,
European journal of radiology,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
January 1983,
AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
January 1983,
Acta radiologica. Supplementum,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
January 1985,
Investigative radiology,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
January 1983,
Neuroradiology,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
May 1986,
Rontgenpraxis; Zeitschrift fur radiologische Technik,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
January 1983,
Acta radiologica: diagnosis,
K D Bolz, and
I O Skalpe, and
T J Gutteberg
April 1984,
Rinsho hoshasen. Clinical radiography,
