-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Three platelet counting methods, i.e. the phase contrast microscopic method, the Thrombocounter (Coulter) and Thrombocell 1000 (Contraves), have been analyzed and compared. Critical evaluation of the results showed marked superiority of the electronic systems over microscopic counting regarding reproducibility and time requirement. The simplicity of sample preparation, which requires no hematocrit correction, and the availability of a capillary blood method renders the Thrombocell 1000 superior to the Coulter Thrombocounter.
Related Publications
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
November 1953,
United States Armed Forces medical journal,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
January 1962,
Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
January 1993,
Nordisk medicin,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
December 2012,
Journal of clinical pathology,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
January 1959,
The American journal of medical technology,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
January 1969,
Minnesota medicine,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
January 1957,
The American journal of medical technology,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
April 1957,
Die Medizinische,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
November 1961,
Technical bulletin of the Registry of Medical Technologists. American Society of Clinical Pathologists. Registry of Medical Technologists,
P W Joller, and
C Babo, and
W H Hitzig
November 1963,
Minerva medica,
