-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Contrast sensitivity functions for normal and specifically disabled readers were measured in two experiments. Each study showed that specifically disabled readers and controls differ in the pattern of relative sensitivity across spatial frequencies. Both studies provide evidence of differences between normal and disabled readers on measures of visual mechanisms fundamental to the reading process.
Related Publications
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
October 1980,
Science (New York, N.Y.),
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
April 1948,
The Journal of pediatrics,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
February 1982,
American journal of optometry and physiological optics,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
May 2003,
Pediatrics in review,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
June 2005,
Biological psychiatry,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
February 1989,
Brain and language,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
June 1972,
South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
July 1976,
Annals of human genetics,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
January 2001,
Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews,
W Lovegrove, and
F Martin, and
A Bowling, and
M Blackwood, and
D Badcock, and
S Paxton
January 1964,
The American journal of orthopsychiatry,
