[History and significance of sensitivity test of anticancer drugs]. 1982

T Taguchi

Many anticancer drugs are now available for clinical use. Unfortunately, most are extremely toxic to normal tissue. Use of one or more toxic drugs inactive against the given patient's own cancer may not only deny the patients the benefit of active therapy but may actually make the patient's cancer grow faster. The need for adjuvant chemotherapy can scarcely be doubted. However, distant metastases may be present at the time of primary surgery in many cases. Some form of generalized therapy like drug therapy or immunotherapy must therefore be used to supplement our local form of treatment such as surgery and radiation therapy for cancer. Already the dangers of cancer chemotherapy are reported as adverse effect, not only in the case of advanced cancer patients, but, that of post operative adjuvant chemotherapy. Therefore, predictive assays analogous to antibiotic sensitivity tests are needed to rule out inactive drugs and select active drugs with least toxicity. The treatment of patients with cancer according to the result of tests of sensitivity of cancer cells to anticancer drugs has been introduced many years ago. The examination of the sensitivity is carried out on explanted tumor cells by two different methodical approaches-observation of the cytotoxic effect of the preparation tested to the growth of the tissue culture of the tumor examined, and a short-term examination with the indication of the effect of anticancer drugs according to the decreased utilization or incorporation of the precussors of the synthesis of proteins, RNA and DNA labeled with radioisotopes, or according to the release of enzymes from tumor cells damaged by an efficient anticancer drug. However, clinicians know that there are many disagreements between the sensitivity test and clinical results. Each sensitivity test has its limitation and problems for resolution. Research toward the goal of the sensitivity test is to divise more appropriate method which is simple prompt and precise for drug selection.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D009369 Neoplasms New abnormal growth of tissue. Malignant neoplasms show a greater degree of anaplasia and have the properties of invasion and metastasis, compared to benign neoplasms. Benign Neoplasm,Cancer,Malignant Neoplasm,Tumor,Tumors,Benign Neoplasms,Malignancy,Malignant Neoplasms,Neoplasia,Neoplasm,Neoplasms, Benign,Cancers,Malignancies,Neoplasias,Neoplasm, Benign,Neoplasm, Malignant,Neoplasms, Malignant
D004351 Drug Resistance Diminished or failed response of an organism, disease or tissue to the intended effectiveness of a chemical or drug. It should be differentiated from DRUG TOLERANCE which is the progressive diminution of the susceptibility of a human or animal to the effects of a drug, as a result of continued administration. Resistance, Drug
D004353 Drug Evaluation, Preclinical Preclinical testing of drugs in experimental animals or in vitro for their biological and toxic effects and potential clinical applications. Drug Screening,Evaluation Studies, Drug, Pre-Clinical,Drug Evaluation Studies, Preclinical,Drug Evaluations, Preclinical,Evaluation Studies, Drug, Preclinical,Evaluation, Preclinical Drug,Evaluations, Preclinical Drug,Medicinal Plants Testing, Preclinical,Preclinical Drug Evaluation,Preclinical Drug Evaluations,Drug Screenings,Screening, Drug,Screenings, Drug
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000818 Animals Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA. Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D000970 Antineoplastic Agents Substances that inhibit or prevent the proliferation of NEOPLASMS. Anticancer Agent,Antineoplastic,Antineoplastic Agent,Antineoplastic Drug,Antitumor Agent,Antitumor Drug,Cancer Chemotherapy Agent,Cancer Chemotherapy Drug,Anticancer Agents,Antineoplastic Drugs,Antineoplastics,Antitumor Agents,Antitumor Drugs,Cancer Chemotherapy Agents,Cancer Chemotherapy Drugs,Chemotherapeutic Anticancer Agents,Chemotherapeutic Anticancer Drug,Agent, Anticancer,Agent, Antineoplastic,Agent, Antitumor,Agent, Cancer Chemotherapy,Agents, Anticancer,Agents, Antineoplastic,Agents, Antitumor,Agents, Cancer Chemotherapy,Agents, Chemotherapeutic Anticancer,Chemotherapy Agent, Cancer,Chemotherapy Agents, Cancer,Chemotherapy Drug, Cancer,Chemotherapy Drugs, Cancer,Drug, Antineoplastic,Drug, Antitumor,Drug, Cancer Chemotherapy,Drug, Chemotherapeutic Anticancer,Drugs, Antineoplastic,Drugs, Antitumor,Drugs, Cancer Chemotherapy
D051379 Mice The common name for the genus Mus. Mice, House,Mus,Mus musculus,Mice, Laboratory,Mouse,Mouse, House,Mouse, Laboratory,Mouse, Swiss,Mus domesticus,Mus musculus domesticus,Swiss Mice,House Mice,House Mouse,Laboratory Mice,Laboratory Mouse,Mice, Swiss,Swiss Mouse,domesticus, Mus musculus
D066298 In Vitro Techniques Methods to study reactions or processes taking place in an artificial environment outside the living organism. In Vitro Test,In Vitro Testing,In Vitro Tests,In Vitro as Topic,In Vitro,In Vitro Technique,In Vitro Testings,Technique, In Vitro,Techniques, In Vitro,Test, In Vitro,Testing, In Vitro,Testings, In Vitro,Tests, In Vitro,Vitro Testing, In

Related Publications

T Taguchi
September 2014, Nature reviews. Drug discovery,
T Taguchi
July 1966, The Tohoku journal of experimental medicine,
T Taguchi
June 1985, Hospital practice (Office ed.),
T Taguchi
January 1975, Annales d'oto-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico faciale : bulletin de la Societe d'oto-laryngologie des hopitaux de Paris,
Copied contents to your clipboard!