-transparent.png){kind=logo}
This study of 10 normal college-aged women was designed to clarify possible antagonist control mechanisms during the silent period of the agonist in rapid elbow extension tasks. Antagonist electromyographic temporal patterns were observed after agonist silence under various conditions to determine if antagonist activity in the rapid movement was controlled supraspinally (preprogrammed), spinally (reflexively), or by a combination of the two mechanisms. The subjects followed a velocity-controlled dot displayed on an oscilloscope. The antagonist latencies remained constant during intentionally and unintentionally terminated movements, but were altered by load conditions. This was seen as an automatic deceleration response, elucidating differences between antagonist control during ballistic and rapid movements.
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
December 1987,
Perceptual and motor skills,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
October 1955,
Annals of physical medicine,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
November 1987,
Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
December 2001,
Journal of oral rehabilitation,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
September 2002,
Brain research,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
May 1984,
Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
January 1990,
European journal of applied physiology and occupational physiology,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
March 1989,
Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
September 2005,
Journal of UOEH,
M B Jacobs, and
L T Andrews, and
A Iannone, and
L Greninger
January 2000,
Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology,
