-transparent.png){kind=logo}
An examination of some anatomopathological and clinical aspects of hydronephrosis and its causes in childhood is followed by the description of a personal case marked by discrepancy between the anatomical and pathological picture of giant hydronephrosis and the complete absence of symptoms, resulting in delay in its clinical detection. Stress is laid on the fact that, although surgical reconstruction of the pyeloureteral junction is possible, a very great number of nephrectomies still have to be performed owing to the tardy discovery of these lesions.
Related Publications
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
January 1970,
Minerva urologica,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
January 1990,
Actas urologicas espanolas,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
June 2001,
Scandinavian journal of urology and nephrology,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
November 2021,
Urology case reports,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
January 1960,
Acta urologica Belgica,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
January 1960,
Acta urologica Belgica,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
January 1960,
Acta urologica Belgica,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
January 1960,
Acta urologica Belgica,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
January 1960,
Acta urologica Belgica,
G Dettori, and
F Alamanni, and
F Bianco, and
G C Canalis, and
P Biglioli
July 1959,
Acta urologica Belgica,
