Evaluation of a new urease reagent strip for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens. 1995

J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
St. Francis Hospital Center, Beech Grove, Indiana, USA.

OBJECTIVE Determine sensitivity and specificity of a new urease reagent strip (URS) test for detection of Helicobacter pylori in gastric biopsy specimens. METHODS Six paired biopsy specimens were obtained from the greater curvature of the distal antrum, the lesser curvature near the incisura, and the corpus along the greater curvature during 66 procedures on 59 patients with endoscopic findings of gastric antral mucosal erythema or erosions, or gastric or duodenal ulcers. One biopsy from each site was tested with the URS. The second was evaluated with histology. A final antral biopsy was evaluated with a urea/gel test. RESULTS Twenty-eight of the 66 cases were histologically positive, with H. pylori observed in at least one of the three biopsy sites. The URS test correctly identified all 28. Of 193 individual biopsy specimens, 78 were positive for H. pylori. The URS correctly identified 77. Sensitivity was 0.99, specificity 0.95, positive predictive value 0.93, negative predictive value 0.99, and kappa 0.92. Average time to positive was 20 min. Twenty-seven antral biopsies were histologically positive for H. pylori. The URS test correctly identified all 27, whereas the urea/gel test correctly identified 21. For antral sites, URS sensitivity was 1.00 and specificity 0.95 versus urea/gel test sensitivity of 0.75 and specificity of 1.00. CONCLUSIONS In this sample, the URS test is as accurate as histology in diagnosing H. pylori infections, and it provides results in less time and at a lower cost than histology.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011706 Pyloric Antrum The region between the sharp indentation at the lower third of the STOMACH (incisura angularis) and the junction of the PYLORUS with the DUODENUM. Pyloric antral glands contain mucus-secreting cells and gastrin-secreting endocrine cells (G CELLS). Antrum, Pyloric,Gastric Antrum,Antrum, Gastric,Antrums, Gastric,Antrums, Pyloric,Gastric Antrums,Pyloric Antrums
D011934 Reagent Strips Narrow pieces of material impregnated or covered with a substance used to produce a chemical reaction. The strips are used in detecting, measuring, producing, etc., other substances. (From Dorland, 28th ed) Reagent Strip,Strip, Reagent,Strips, Reagent
D005069 Evaluation Studies as Topic Works about studies that determine the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. Critique,Evaluation Indexes,Evaluation Methodology,Evaluation Report,Evaluation Research,Methodology, Evaluation,Pre-Post Tests,Qualitative Evaluation,Quantitative Evaluation,Theoretical Effectiveness,Use-Effectiveness,Critiques,Effectiveness, Theoretical,Evaluation Methodologies,Evaluation Reports,Evaluation, Qualitative,Evaluation, Quantitative,Evaluations, Qualitative,Evaluations, Quantitative,Indexes, Evaluation,Methodologies, Evaluation,Pre Post Tests,Pre-Post Test,Qualitative Evaluations,Quantitative Evaluations,Report, Evaluation,Reports, Evaluation,Research, Evaluation,Test, Pre-Post,Tests, Pre-Post,Use Effectiveness
D005753 Gastric Mucosa Lining of the STOMACH, consisting of an inner EPITHELIUM, a middle LAMINA PROPRIA, and an outer MUSCULARIS MUCOSAE. The surface cells produce MUCUS that protects the stomach from attack by digestive acid and enzymes. When the epithelium invaginates into the LAMINA PROPRIA at various region of the stomach (CARDIA; GASTRIC FUNDUS; and PYLORUS), different tubular gastric glands are formed. These glands consist of cells that secrete mucus, enzymes, HYDROCHLORIC ACID, or hormones. Cardiac Glands,Gastric Glands,Pyloric Glands,Cardiac Gland,Gastric Gland,Gastric Mucosas,Gland, Cardiac,Gland, Gastric,Gland, Pyloric,Glands, Cardiac,Glands, Gastric,Glands, Pyloric,Mucosa, Gastric,Mucosas, Gastric,Pyloric Gland
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D001431 Bacteriological Techniques Techniques used in studying bacteria. Bacteriologic Technic,Bacteriologic Technics,Bacteriologic Techniques,Bacteriological Technique,Technic, Bacteriological,Technics, Bacteriological,Technique, Bacteriological,Techniques, Bacteriological,Bacteriologic Technique,Bacteriological Technic,Bacteriological Technics,Technic, Bacteriologic,Technics, Bacteriologic,Technique, Bacteriologic,Techniques, Bacteriologic
D001706 Biopsy Removal and pathologic examination of specimens from the living body. Biopsies
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D013048 Specimen Handling Procedures for collecting, preserving, and transporting of specimens sufficiently stable to provide accurate and precise results suitable for clinical interpretation. Specimen Collection,Collection, Specimen,Collections, Specimen,Handling, Specimen,Handlings, Specimen,Specimen Collections,Specimen Handlings

Related Publications

J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
November 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
July 1993, European journal of epidemiology,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
June 2002, Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
September 1996, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
February 1994, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
April 2019, Endoscopy international open,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
July 1993, Journal of clinical pathology,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
January 2005, Vojnosanitetski pregled,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
February 1996, Journal of clinical pathology,
J D Rogge, and D R Wagner, and R J Carrico, and E A Glowinski, and S J Mahoney, and R C Boguslaski, and R M Genta
August 2002, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease,
Copied contents to your clipboard!