A single addition of 3 x I0-7 M ET-1, ET-2 or ET-3 produced contractions that reached a steady state in 28.2 +/- 4.2, 21.1 +/- 1.3 and 24.0 +/- 3.8 min, respectively and took 2.7 +/- 0.4, 2.1 + 0.1 and 1.6 +/- 0.1 min to reach half of this steady-state response.4. Contractions induced by 3 x I0-7 M big ET-11-38 or big ET-11- 39 reached a plateau in 38.5 +/- 3.6 and 35.6 +/- 3.3 min, respectively, and half of these responses were attained in 12.0 +/- 2.5 and 7.1 +/- 1.1 min.Thus, these contractions developed more slowly than those induced by ET-1. Contractions induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-21-38 were also much slower to develop than those to ET-2, for these took 49 +/- 2 min to reach plateau and 19.4 +/- 2.1 min to attain half that response. Contractions induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-31-41 amide took 50.2 +/- 3.7 min to reach a plateau and 27.3 +/- 3.0 min to reach half of this response.5. Phosphoramidon (0.1, 1 and 3 x 10-4 M) inhibited contractions induced by big ET-11.39. For instance,the contractions induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-11-39 were inhibited by 10-4 M or 3 x 10-4 M of phosphoramidon by 62.8 +/- 6.7% or 74.5 +/- 4.6%, respectively. Similarly, contractions induced by ET-21-38 were inhibited by 91.3 +/- 5.4% and the small response induced by big ET-3l-4l amide was abolished by 3 x 10-4M phosphoramidon. Conversely, the neutral endopeptidase (EC 24.11) inhibitor DL-thiorphan(3 x 10-4 M) had no effect. Captopril (10-5 M), pepstatin A (10-5 M), phenylmethylsulphonylfluoride(PMSF, 10-3 M), aprotinin (10-5 M), E-64 (10-5 M), cystatin (10-6 M), leupeptin (10-4 M),chymostatin (10-4 M), or bestatin (10-5 M) did not inhibit but rather increased to a similar, but small degree the contractions induced by 3 to 30 x 10-9 M big ET-11-39. Only captopril (10-5 M) or leupeptin(10-4 M) increased the contraction induced by 3 x 10-7 M big ET-11-39. Phosphoramidon (10-4 M),pepstatin (10-5 M) or PMSF (10-3 M) did not affect contractions induced by ET-1.6. Removal of the epithelium increased by 70% the size of the contraction induced by 5 microM histamine(1.08 +/- 0.05 g; n = 160 to 1.84 +/- 0.14 g; n = 12) but did not affect, in absolute terms, the contraction induced by ET-1 (as a % of the response to histamine, these responses were, of course, apparently depressed). Epithelium removal did, however, increase the size of the contractions induced by 3 to 30 x 10-9 M big ET-1 -39 which was very similar to the effect of the protease inhibitors.7. In competition binding studies on membranes prepared from the guinea-pig gallbladder, 10-11 MET-1 inhibited by 76.9 +/- 3.1% the binding of [125]-ET-I while porcine big ET-11-39 caused no inhibition(0.7 +/- 3.0; n = 3). ET-1 (10-6 M) inhibited binding by 95.7 =/- 1.1% (n = 3) while at this much higher concentration, big ET-11-39 inhibited binding by only 16.8 +/- 4.2% (n = 3). This clearly suggests that big ET-11-39 does not bind directly to ET receptors.8. Thus, a phosphoramidon-sensitive endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE), different from neutral endopeptidase (NEP; EC 24.11) and not located on the epithelium, converts big ET-1 into ET-1 in the gallbladder of the guinea-pig. This ECE appears to act preferentially on big ET-1 or big ET-2 over bigET-3.