Biomaterial Database

[Prospects for using the SOS-Chromotest for predicting carcinogenic activity of chemical compounds]. 1995

S V Koreshkova, and T B Tanirbergenov, and V A Tarasov

When studying the carcinogenic activity of a compound, one of the basic problems is to determine the predictability of the methods used for testing; in our opinion, the most promising method is the SOS chromotest. To evaluate the test, we sampled 25 substances with a known carcinogenic activity, which had not been tested with the SOS chromotest before. Properties of the SOS chromotest were analyzed on the basis of a database containing 154 substances at present, which are characterized with regard to the presence or absence of a carcinogenic effect in rodents. The results are distributed as follows: 121 carcinogens, of which 79 positively respond to the SOS chromotest; 33 noncarcinogenes, of which 28 negatively respond to the SOS chromotest. The sensitivity and specificity of the SOS chromotest were measured as 65.3 and 84.9%, respectively. Comparing the results obtained with the Ames test and with the SOS chromotest, it was shown that the tests were similar in sensitivity and specificity. A similar predictability of both methods was also recorded.

UI	MeSH Term	Description	Entries
D011237	Predictive Value of Tests	In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test.	Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D000818	Animals	Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA.	Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D013014	SOS Response, Genetics	An error-prone mechanism or set of functions for repairing damaged microbial DNA. SOS functions (a concept reputedly derived from the SOS of the international distress signal) are involved in DNA repair and mutagenesis, in cell division inhibition, in recovery of normal physiological conditions after DNA repair, and possibly in cell death when DNA damage is extensive.	SOS Response (Genetics),SOS Box,SOS Function,SOS Induction,SOS Region,SOS Repair,SOS Response,SOS System,Box, SOS,Function, SOS,Functions, SOS,Genetics SOS Response,Genetics SOS Responses,Induction, SOS,Inductions, SOS,Region, SOS,Regions, SOS,Repair, SOS,Repairs, SOS,Response, Genetics SOS,Response, SOS,Response, SOS (Genetics),Responses, Genetics SOS,Responses, SOS,Responses, SOS (Genetics),SOS Functions,SOS Inductions,SOS Regions,SOS Repairs,SOS Responses,SOS Responses (Genetics),SOS Responses, Genetics,SOS Systems,System, SOS,Systems, SOS
D015197	Carcinogenicity Tests	Tests to experimentally measure the tumor-producing/cancer cell-producing potency of an agent by administering the agent (e.g., benzanthracenes) and observing the quantity of tumors or the cell transformation developed over a given period of time. The carcinogenicity value is usually measured as milligrams of agent administered per tumor developed. Though this test differs from the DNA-repair and bacterial microsome MUTAGENICITY TESTS, researchers often attempt to correlate the finding of carcinogenicity values and mutagenicity values.	Tumorigenicity Tests,Carcinogen Tests,Carcinogenesis Tests,Carcinogenic Activity Tests,Carcinogenic Potency Tests,Carcinogen Test,Carcinogenesis Test,Carcinogenic Activity Test,Carcinogenic Potency Test,Carcinogenicity Test,Potency Test, Carcinogenic,Potency Tests, Carcinogenic,Test, Carcinogen,Test, Carcinogenesis,Test, Carcinogenic Activity,Test, Carcinogenic Potency,Test, Carcinogenicity,Test, Tumorigenicity,Tests, Carcinogen,Tests, Carcinogenesis,Tests, Carcinogenic Activity,Tests, Carcinogenic Potency,Tests, Carcinogenicity,Tests, Tumorigenicity,Tumorigenicity Test
D016208	Databases, Factual	Extensive collections, reputedly complete, of facts and data garnered from material of a specialized subject area and made available for analysis and application. The collection can be automated by various contemporary methods for retrieval. The concept should be differentiated from DATABASES, BIBLIOGRAPHIC which is restricted to collections of bibliographic references.	Databanks, Factual,Data Banks, Factual,Data Bases, Factual,Data Bank, Factual,Data Base, Factual,Databank, Factual,Database, Factual,Factual Data Bank,Factual Data Banks,Factual Data Base,Factual Data Bases,Factual Databank,Factual Databanks,Factual Database,Factual Databases