1. We recorded single vestibular nucleus neurons shown by electrical stimulation to receive floccular inhibition [flocculus receiving neurons (FRNs)] and/or to project toward midbrain motoneuronal pools [midbrain projecting neurons (MPNs)] in awake, head-fixed rabbits during compensatory eye movements. Stimuli included head rotation in the light, head rotation in the dark, and rotation of an optokinetic drum about the animal. We employed sinusoidal and triangular position profiles in the 0.05- to 0.8-Hz frequency band. We also examined transient responses to step changes in eye position. 2. We found identified vestibular nucleus cells (i.e., FRN/non-MPNs, FRN/MPNs, and non-FRN/MPNs) in the parvocellular and magnocellular portions of the medial vestibular nucleus, at the rostrocaudal level of the dorsal acoustic stria. 3. All identified vestibular nucleus neurons were excited during ipsilateral (relative to side of recording) head rotation and contralateral eye rotation. 4. The neuronal firing rates could be related to eye position and its time derivatives, and that relationship could be approximated by a two-pole, one-zero linear transfer function. As with abducens neurons, a more detailed approximation requires inclusion of two nonlinearities-a hysteresis and a variable sensitivity term that increases as eye movement amplitude decreases. 5. When the vestibuloocular reflex is suppressed by a conflicting full-field visual stimulus [visual vestibular conflict condition (VVC)], vestibular nucleus neuron modulation is largely suppressed. The remaining modulation is motoric in nature, because it can be related to the residual eye movements. Cells with "sensory vestibular signals," i.e., cells whose modulation during VVC correlates better with head rotation than eye movement, were not encountered. 6. We examined the dependence of firing rate parameters on stimulus modality. All neurons exhibited increased phase lead with respect to abducens nucleus neurons during stimuli involving head rotation. This finding could indicate that vestibular-derived inputs are inhomogeneously distributed on premotor neurons and that the studied premotor population receives a stronger vestibular input than another premotor group, not recorded in the current experiments. 7. FRNs and non-FRNs were similar in their qualitative response to the fast phases, the applicability of the two-pole, one-zero transfer function, hysteresis, and the amplitude nonlinearity. 8. FRNs differed from non-FRNs in having a phase advanced firing rate at all stimulus frequencies during visual and vestibular stimuli. The phase difference suggests that one role of the rabbit flocculus is to regulate phase of the net premotor signal.