Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. 1995

M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Lainz Medical Center, Vienna, Austria.

Meticulous pretreatment evaluation is basic to the successful management of suspected ovarian masses. Among currently available imaging techniques, sonography and computerized tomography are the most important diagnostic modalities. The purpose of our study was to determine whether magnetic resonance imaging provided additional information on masses in the true pelvis. 73 patients with masses in the true pelvis underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. MRI was done with a 1.0 T supraconductive magnet (Magnetom Impact, Siemens). The results obtained were compared with sonographic (transabdominal and transvaginal), intraoperative and histopathologic findings. MR images were evaluated for their information on differentiation between benign and malignant neoplasm, tumor staging, lymph node involvement, peritoneal spread, local extension and organ relation. MRI correctly characterized malignant and benign tumors in 97% of cases versus 81% on ultrasound. The site of the primary tumor was correctly diagnosed in 94% of cases on MRI images versus 86% on ultrasound images. Invasion of adjacent intestinal segments as well as peritoneal carcinomatosis and omental metastases (metastasis > 1 cm) were also detected in the majority of cases. Based on our results MRI performs well at lesion detection and characterization in the evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. MRI should be considered in the investigation of patients with complicated findings on ultrasound.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008279 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Non-invasive method of demonstrating internal anatomy based on the principle that atomic nuclei in a strong magnetic field absorb pulses of radiofrequency energy and emit them as radiowaves which can be reconstructed into computerized images. The concept includes proton spin tomographic techniques. Chemical Shift Imaging,MR Tomography,MRI Scans,MRI, Functional,Magnetic Resonance Image,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Functional,Magnetization Transfer Contrast Imaging,NMR Imaging,NMR Tomography,Tomography, NMR,Tomography, Proton Spin,fMRI,Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Imaging, Chemical Shift,Proton Spin Tomography,Spin Echo Imaging,Steady-State Free Precession MRI,Tomography, MR,Zeugmatography,Chemical Shift Imagings,Echo Imaging, Spin,Echo Imagings, Spin,Functional MRI,Functional MRIs,Image, Magnetic Resonance,Imaging, Magnetic Resonance,Imaging, NMR,Imaging, Spin Echo,Imagings, Chemical Shift,Imagings, Spin Echo,MRI Scan,MRIs, Functional,Magnetic Resonance Images,Resonance Image, Magnetic,Scan, MRI,Scans, MRI,Shift Imaging, Chemical,Shift Imagings, Chemical,Spin Echo Imagings,Steady State Free Precession MRI
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D010049 Ovarian Diseases Pathological processes of the OVARY. Disease, Ovarian,Diseases, Ovarian,Ovarian Disease
D010051 Ovarian Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the OVARY. These neoplasms can be benign or malignant. They are classified according to the tissue of origin, such as the surface EPITHELIUM, the stromal endocrine cells, and the totipotent GERM CELLS. Cancer of Ovary,Ovarian Cancer,Cancer of the Ovary,Neoplasms, Ovarian,Ovary Cancer,Ovary Neoplasms,Cancer, Ovarian,Cancer, Ovary,Cancers, Ovarian,Cancers, Ovary,Neoplasm, Ovarian,Neoplasm, Ovary,Neoplasms, Ovary,Ovarian Cancers,Ovarian Neoplasm,Ovary Cancers,Ovary Neoplasm
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D003937 Diagnosis, Differential Determination of which one of two or more diseases or conditions a patient is suffering from by systematically comparing and contrasting results of diagnostic measures. Diagnoses, Differential,Differential Diagnoses,Differential Diagnosis
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D014463 Ultrasonography The visualization of deep structures of the body by recording the reflections or echoes of ultrasonic pulses directed into the tissues. Use of ultrasound for imaging or diagnostic purposes employs frequencies ranging from 1.6 to 10 megahertz. Echography,Echotomography,Echotomography, Computer,Sonography, Medical,Tomography, Ultrasonic,Ultrasonic Diagnosis,Ultrasonic Imaging,Ultrasonographic Imaging,Computer Echotomography,Diagnosis, Ultrasonic,Diagnostic Ultrasound,Ultrasonic Tomography,Ultrasound Imaging,Diagnoses, Ultrasonic,Diagnostic Ultrasounds,Imaging, Ultrasonic,Imaging, Ultrasonographic,Imaging, Ultrasound,Imagings, Ultrasonographic,Imagings, Ultrasound,Medical Sonography,Ultrasonic Diagnoses,Ultrasonographic Imagings,Ultrasound, Diagnostic,Ultrasounds, Diagnostic

Related Publications

M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
January 2002, Anticancer research,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
June 1991, Clinical obstetrics and gynecology,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
March 1988, The British journal of radiology,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
September 1992, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
September 1985, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
February 1994, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
September 2013, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
June 2008, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
February 1998, The Journal of cardiovascular surgery,
M Medl, and K J Kulenkampff, and M Stiskal, and C Peters-Engl, and S Leodolter, and H Czembirek
December 2014, European radiology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!