Q-beta replicase-amplified assay for detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis directly from clinical specimens. 1995

J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
GENE-TRAK, Framingham, Massachusetts 01701, USA.

We report the results of a study conducted to evaluate the performance of manual Q-Beta replicase-amplified Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex assay compared with that of culture for detecting M. tuberculosis directly from digested sputum pellets. A total of 261 specimens submitted to three tuberculosis testing laboratories were analyzed. Culture and acid-fast bacillus smear results were provided by the tuberculosis testing laboratories. Of these 261 specimens, 34 (13% prevalence rate) were positive for M. tuberculosis by culture. The samples were digested and decontaminated by the testing laboratories by using their standard digestion and decontamination procedures. An aliquot of the digested and decontaminated pellet was sent to GENE-TRAK. The digested and decontaminated pellet was neutralized by washing it with 0.067 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and the bacteria present in the washed pellet were heat inactivated at 100 degrees C for 15 min. The samples were combined with sample processing buffer containing GuSCN and were treated for 6 min in the GENE-TRAK Sample Processing Instrument to release the nucleic acids. The release rRNA was analyzed in a manual Q-Beta replicase assay format which incorporates elements of sandwich hybridization, reversible target capture, and Q-beta replicase signal amplification technologies. In comparison with culture, the overall assay sensitivity and specificity were 97.1 and 96.5%, respectively. The positive predictive value was 80.5%, and the negative predictive value was 99.5%. After analysis of discrepant results, the assay sensitivity and specificity were 97.3 and 97.8, respectively, and the prevalence rate was 14%. The positive predictive value and the negative predictive value were 87.8 and 99.5%, respectively. The Q-Beta replicase assay is rapid sensitive, semiquantitative, and specific for the direct detection of M. tuberculosis from clinical specimens.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D009169 Mycobacterium tuberculosis A species of gram-positive, aerobic bacteria that produces TUBERCULOSIS in humans, other primates, CATTLE; DOGS; and some other animals which have contact with humans. Growth tends to be in serpentine, cordlike masses in which the bacilli show a parallel orientation. Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv
D011777 Q beta Replicase An enzyme that catalyzes the replication of the RNA of coliphage Q beta. EC 2.7.7.-. Qbeta Replicase,Replicase, Q beta,Replicase, Qbeta,beta Replicase, Q
D005069 Evaluation Studies as Topic Works about studies that determine the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. Critique,Evaluation Indexes,Evaluation Methodology,Evaluation Report,Evaluation Research,Methodology, Evaluation,Pre-Post Tests,Qualitative Evaluation,Quantitative Evaluation,Theoretical Effectiveness,Use-Effectiveness,Critiques,Effectiveness, Theoretical,Evaluation Methodologies,Evaluation Reports,Evaluation, Qualitative,Evaluation, Quantitative,Evaluations, Qualitative,Evaluations, Quantitative,Indexes, Evaluation,Methodologies, Evaluation,Pre Post Tests,Pre-Post Test,Qualitative Evaluations,Quantitative Evaluations,Report, Evaluation,Reports, Evaluation,Research, Evaluation,Test, Pre-Post,Tests, Pre-Post,Use Effectiveness
D005188 False Negative Reactions Negative test results in subjects who possess the attribute for which the test is conducted. The labeling of diseased persons as healthy when screening in the detection of disease. (Last, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) False Negative Reaction,Reaction, False Negative,Reactions, False Negative
D005189 False Positive Reactions Positive test results in subjects who do not possess the attribute for which the test is conducted. The labeling of healthy persons as diseased when screening in the detection of disease. (Last, A Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) False Positive Reaction,Positive Reaction, False,Positive Reactions, False,Reaction, False Positive,Reactions, False Positive
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D001431 Bacteriological Techniques Techniques used in studying bacteria. Bacteriologic Technic,Bacteriologic Technics,Bacteriologic Techniques,Bacteriological Technique,Technic, Bacteriological,Technics, Bacteriological,Technique, Bacteriological,Techniques, Bacteriological,Bacteriologic Technique,Bacteriological Technic,Bacteriological Technics,Technic, Bacteriologic,Technics, Bacteriologic,Technique, Bacteriologic,Techniques, Bacteriologic
D012338 RNA, Ribosomal, 23S Constituent of 50S subunit of prokaryotic ribosomes containing about 3200 nucleotides. 23S rRNA is involved in the initiation of polypeptide synthesis. 23S Ribosomal RNA,23S rRNA,RNA, 23S Ribosomal,Ribosomal RNA, 23S,rRNA, 23S
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D013183 Sputum Material coughed up from the lungs and expectorated via the mouth. It contains MUCUS, cellular debris, and microorganisms. It may also contain blood or pus. Sputum, Induced,Induced Sputum,Induced Sputums,Sputums,Sputums, Induced

Related Publications

J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
June 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
April 1995, Journal of clinical microbiology,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
June 1997, Journal of clinical microbiology,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
January 1999, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
September 1995, Analytical biochemistry,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
August 2009, Journal of applied microbiology,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
July 2019, The Indian journal of medical research,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
January 1990, Annales de biologie clinique,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
February 1994, Journal of clinical microbiology,
J S Shah, and J Liu, and D Buxton, and A Hendricks, and L Robinson, and G Radcliffe, and W King, and D Lane, and D M Olive, and J D Klinger
October 1996, Molecular and cellular probes,
Copied contents to your clipboard!