Tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) in patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison with CEA, CA 50 and CA 242. 1995

P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
Department of Surgery, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.

A prospective study of 62 patients with colorectal cancer was carried out to evaluate the value of tumour-associated trypsin inhibitor (TATI) in the diagnosis and staging of this disease. The reference group consisted of 97 patients with benign gastrointestinal disease. Increased serum TATI levels were detected in 46 patients with colorectal cancer (sensitivity 74%), and the highest mean values were measured in the patients with stage II cancer. The frequency of elevated values was not affected by the stage of the disease, however. There were altogether 64 false positives (specificity 34%). In comparison to CEA and CA 242, TATI showed higher sensitivity at low (< 40%) specificity levels, but it was less sensitive at high (70-95%) specificity levels. The performance of the CA 50 test was poorest both at high and low specificity levels. The various combinations of TATI and other markers (two tests positive) did not offer any further advantage as compared to CEA alone. A marginally significant positive correlation (p = 0.07) was found between serum TATI and CEA values in colorectal cancer patients. The results suggest that TATI is a very sensitive marker in colorectal cancer, but its utility is limited because of its low specificity in symptomatic patients. Concomitant measurement of TATI and other markers does not seem to give any further benefit, and nor does TATI seem to have any significant value in staging of the disease. Our results also indicate that CEA is probably the best current test in colorectal cancer.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D002272 Carcinoembryonic Antigen A glycoprotein that is secreted into the luminal surface of the epithelia in the gastrointestinal tract. It is found in the feces and pancreaticobiliary secretions and is used to monitor the response to colon cancer treatment. Antigens, CD66e,CD66e Antigen,Antigen, CD66e,Antigen, Carcinoembryonic,CD66e Antigens
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D000369 Aged, 80 and over Persons 80 years of age and older. Oldest Old
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity

Related Publications

P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
August 1987, British journal of cancer,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
January 1991, Scandinavian journal of clinical and laboratory investigation. Supplementum,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
January 2012, Oncology,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
February 2001, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
September 1994, British journal of cancer,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
March 1988, British journal of cancer,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
October 2003, Histology and histopathology,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
February 1990, British journal of cancer,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
May 1995, British journal of cancer,
P Pasanen, and M Eskelinen, and A Kulju, and I Penttilä, and E Janatuinen, and E Alhava
August 1986, British journal of cancer,
Copied contents to your clipboard!