This review summarizes current knowledge concerning the value of systolic time intervals in coronary artery disease. Although the usual pattern of prolongation of the preejection period (PEP) and shortening of the left ventricular ejection time (LVET) characteristic of left ventricular failure is seen in acute myocardial infarction, the systolic time intervals (as well as all other measures) are profoundly influenced by adrenergic hyperactivity characteristics of this disorder. Adrenergic stimulation normally shortens both the PEP and LVET indexes and decreases the PEP/LVET ratio. The degree of shortening of electromechanical systole (QS2) is directed related to the excessive adrenergic tone. Patients with the greatest systolic time interval abnormalities have a poorer prognosis, a greater incidence of congestive heart failure and more abnormalities of directly measured indexes of left ventricular performance. The systolic time intervals are useful for assessing left ventricular performance in chronic coronary artery disease as well. In chronic coronary artery disease the PEP/LVET ratio and angiographically determined left ventricular ejection fraction are closely correlated ( r = -0.76), but the level of this correlation is less than that in other forms of left ventricular disease. The left ventricular ejection time index is prolonged after exercise in patients with angina pectoris when compared with findings in normal subjects. Failure of the ischemic ventricle to respond to adrenergic stimulation is the most likely mechanism. Addition of the postexercise left ventricular ejection time to standard treadmill stress testing identifies a significant number of patients (23 percent) who would have had false negative results by electrocardiographic criteria alone. In addition, this index provides confirmatory evidence in those with apparently positive electrocardiographic test data. The systolic time intervals have been useful in assessing both medical and surgical therapy in coronary artery disease. The test can be performed repeatedly and provides a measure of both left ventricular performance and extent of adrenergic hyperactivity. Thus, evaluation of therapy represents the most useful future application of systolic time intervals.