-transparent.png){kind=logo}
We recorded spinal and cortical somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) after sural and tibial nerve stimulation at the ankle in 34 normal subjects. Spinal SEPs were reproducible with sural nerve stimulation in only 65% of normal subjects. The spinal amplitudes were significantly smaller after sural nerve stimulation. Central conduction time (CCT) was significantly shorter when measured from onset instead of peak latencies. There was a significant difference between CCT with tibial nerve and sural nerve stimulation. Our results are consistent with the idea that CCT measures from onset and peak latencies do reflect the travel of the afferent volley in different spinal fiber populations.
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
July 1987,
Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
February 2001,
Yonsei medical journal,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
March 1991,
Muscle & nerve,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
July 2016,
Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
August 1985,
Journal of the neurological sciences,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
March 2003,
Neuroreport,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
June 1994,
British journal of anaesthesia,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
February 2019,
Annals of rehabilitation medicine,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
January 1988,
Medycyna pracy,
X Delberghe, and
E Brunko, and
N Mavroudakis, and
D Zegers de Beyl
September 2008,
Brain & development,
