A 1-week dose-ranging study of inhaled salmeterol in patients with asthma. 1994

E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
Intermountain Allergy and Asthma Clinic, Salt Lake City.

OBJECTIVE A dose-ranging study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new long-acting, selective beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, salmeterol. METHODS Adolescents and adults (N = 160) with mild-to-moderate asthma received salmeterol (10.5, 21, 42, or 84 micrograms) or placebo by metered-dose inhaler twice daily for 1 week. Twelve-hour serial spirometry measurements were performed on the first and last days of treatment, and patients recorded their peak expiratory flow (PEF) twice daily on diary cards. RESULTS On day 1, salmeterol produced greater bronchodilation than placebo (p = 0.001), and both the 42-micrograms and 84-micrograms doses of salmeterol were significantly more effective in improving FEV1 responses than the two lower doses of salmeterol (p < 0.05). After 1 week of treatment, all but the 21-micrograms dose of salmeterol remained statistically superior to placebo (p < 0.01), but significant differences between salmeterol doses were no longer evident, despite an apparent dose-response effect. Only the 42-micrograms and 84-micrograms doses of salmeterol sustained bronchodilation for 12 h in the majority of patients at both treatment days. The degree of improvement in morning and evening PEF was also found to be dose related. There was no significant difference among treatment groups in the overall incidence of adverse events; however, pharmacologically predictable events (eg, tremor) occurred significantly more often with salmeterol, 84 micrograms. CONCLUSIONS Salmeterol, 42 micrograms, was similar in efficacy to 84 micrograms but was associated with a lower incidence of adverse events. Salmeterol, 42 micrograms twice daily, is a safe and effective dosage for patients with mild-to-moderate asthma who are persistently symptomatic and require maintenance bronchodilator therapy.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008450 Maximal Midexpiratory Flow Rate Measurement of rate of airflow over the middle half of a FORCED VITAL CAPACITY determination (from the 25 percent level to the 75 percent level). Common abbreviations are MMFR and FEF 25%-75%. Forced Expiratory Flow 025-075 Percent,FEF 25-75 Percent,Flow Rate, Maximal Midexpiratory,MMFR,25-75 Percent, FEF,25-75 Percents, FEF,FEF 25 75 Percent,FEF 25-75 Percents,Forced Expiratory Flow 025 075 Percent,Percent, FEF 25-75,Percents, FEF 25-75
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009330 Nebulizers and Vaporizers Devices that cause a liquid or solid to be converted into an aerosol (spray) or a vapor. It is used in drug administration by inhalation, humidification of ambient air, and in certain analytical instruments. Atomizers,Inhalation Devices,Inhalators,Inhalers,Vaporizers,Nebulizers,Vaporizers and Nebulizers,Atomizer,Device, Inhalation,Devices, Inhalation,Inhalation Device,Inhalator,Inhaler,Nebulizer,Vaporizer
D010366 Peak Expiratory Flow Rate Measurement of the maximum rate of airflow attained during a FORCED VITAL CAPACITY determination. Common abbreviations are PEFR and PFR. Expiratory Peak Flow Rate,Flow Rate, Peak Expiratory,PEFR
D001993 Bronchodilator Agents Agents that cause an increase in the expansion of a bronchus or bronchial tubes. Bronchial-Dilating Agents,Bronchodilator,Bronchodilator Agent,Broncholytic Agent,Bronchodilator Effect,Bronchodilator Effects,Bronchodilators,Broncholytic Agents,Broncholytic Effect,Broncholytic Effects,Agent, Bronchodilator,Agent, Broncholytic,Agents, Bronchial-Dilating,Agents, Bronchodilator,Agents, Broncholytic,Bronchial Dilating Agents,Effect, Bronchodilator,Effect, Broncholytic,Effects, Bronchodilator,Effects, Broncholytic
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D004305 Dose-Response Relationship, Drug The relationship between the dose of an administered drug and the response of the organism to the drug. Dose Response Relationship, Drug,Dose-Response Relationships, Drug,Drug Dose-Response Relationship,Drug Dose-Response Relationships,Relationship, Drug Dose-Response,Relationships, Drug Dose-Response
D004311 Double-Blind Method A method of studying a drug or procedure in which both the subjects and investigators are kept unaware of who is actually getting which specific treatment. Double-Masked Study,Double-Blind Study,Double-Masked Method,Double Blind Method,Double Blind Study,Double Masked Method,Double Masked Study,Double-Blind Methods,Double-Blind Studies,Double-Masked Methods,Double-Masked Studies,Method, Double-Blind,Method, Double-Masked,Methods, Double-Blind,Methods, Double-Masked,Studies, Double-Blind,Studies, Double-Masked,Study, Double-Blind,Study, Double-Masked
D005260 Female Females

Related Publications

E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
January 1997, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
January 1999, The European respiratory journal,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
July 2016, Allergy and asthma proceedings,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
December 2001, JAMA,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
December 2001, JAMA,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
December 2001, JAMA,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
December 2001, JAMA,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
March 1992, British journal of clinical pharmacology,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
February 1998, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology,
E A Bronsky, and J P Kemp, and H A Orgel, and C W Bierman, and D G Tinkelman, and A van As, and R F Liddle
June 1999, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!