Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. 1994

J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
Pathology Department, York Hospital, Pa.

OBJECTIVE To compare first-voided urine specimens with paired endocervical swab specimens from women to determine the role of urine in complementing or replacing swab specimens for the detection of the chlamydial antigen. METHODS For 18 months, both endocervical swab specimens (the criterion standard) and urine specimens were tested for the chlamydial antigen, using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Chlamydiazyme, Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, Ill). Positive results were confirmed using a blocking reagent (Abbott Laboratories) and/or a direct fluorescent antibody test (Micro-Trak, Syva, Palo Alto, Calif). A low level of chlamydial antigen (below the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay threshold recommended by the manufacturer) was also looked for and, when found, was confirmed by the direct fluorescent antibody test. METHODS Prenatal and family practice clinics in a 500-bed community hospital. METHODS Specimens were collected from 489 random asymptomatic or symptomatic women. METHODS The detection of the chlamydial antigen from endocervical swab specimens was compared with the detection from first-voided urine specimens. RESULTS Acceptable swab and urine specimens were obtained from 300 (61.3%) of the patients. The antigen of Chlamydia trachomatis was confirmed in 20 (6.7%) of the 300 women. Of the infected patients, the antigen was detected in both swab and urine specimens for nine patients (45%), only in the swab specimens for eight (40%), and only in the urine specimens for three (15%). Testing urine in addition to endocervical swab specimens allowed for the detection of 18% more chlamydial infections, whereas confirming the presence of the antigen below the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay cutoff resulted in the detection of 54% more infections. CONCLUSIONS Collecting multiple specimens and testing for low levels of chlamydial antigen may significantly improve the detection of chlamydial infections in women. First-voided urine may be an appropriate complementary specimen to endocervical swab specimens, but urine by itself does not allow for the adequate detection of the chlamydial antigen in women.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D002690 Chlamydia Infections Infections with bacteria of the genus CHLAMYDIA. Infections, Chlamydia,Chlamydia Infection,Infection, Chlamydia
D002692 Chlamydia trachomatis Type species of CHLAMYDIA causing a variety of ocular and urogenital diseases.
D004797 Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay An immunoassay utilizing an antibody labeled with an enzyme marker such as horseradish peroxidase. While either the enzyme or the antibody is bound to an immunosorbent substrate, they both retain their biologic activity; the change in enzyme activity as a result of the enzyme-antibody-antigen reaction is proportional to the concentration of the antigen and can be measured spectrophotometrically or with the naked eye. Many variations of the method have been developed. ELISA,Assay, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent,Assays, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent,Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay,Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays,Immunosorbent Assay, Enzyme-Linked,Immunosorbent Assays, Enzyme-Linked
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000942 Antigens, Bacterial Substances elaborated by bacteria that have antigenic activity. Bacterial Antigen,Bacterial Antigens,Antigen, Bacterial
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity
D013048 Specimen Handling Procedures for collecting, preserving, and transporting of specimens sufficiently stable to provide accurate and precise results suitable for clinical interpretation. Specimen Collection,Collection, Specimen,Collections, Specimen,Handling, Specimen,Handlings, Specimen,Specimen Collections,Specimen Handlings

Related Publications

J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
March 1985, Journal of clinical pathology,
J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
January 2003, Journal of clinical microbiology,
J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
September 2018, Journal of clinical microbiology,
J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
December 1983, The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine,
J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
December 2008, Journal of pediatric and adolescent gynecology,
J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
February 1983, European journal of clinical microbiology,
J A Kellogg, and B T Vanderhoff, and J W Seiple, and M E Hick
April 1988, Journal of clinical microbiology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!