-transparent.png){kind=logo}
The authors after studying eight different cases of ectopic ureters, try to illustrate the most important points of the diagnostic course in this pathology. In fact, in this field of studies, it is not easy, every time, to define diagnosis by the usual ways of investigation, so the authors describe just those cases which were missed by past clinical evaluations. They want to demonstrate by their experience of work, that it is possible to avoid a wrong diagnosis by an accurate evaluation of the clinical phenomenology, but most of all by a good research and right interpretation of the clinical and radiologic signs, direct and not, of this pathology.
Related Publications
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
June 1989,
Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
January 1981,
Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
May 1965,
The Journal of urology,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
February 1960,
The Journal of urology,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
January 1978,
Acta urologica Belgica,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
January 1970,
Urologia internationalis,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
March 1988,
Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
April 1990,
Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
January 1965,
Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica,
L Croce, and
G Verrini, and
G Lo Conte, and
P D Palladini
April 2003,
Hinyokika kiyo. Acta urologica Japonica,
