Influence of donor and histocompatibility factors on corneal graft outcome. 1994

A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
Department of Transplantation Sciences, University of Bristol, Westbury-on-Trym, United Kingdom.

The Corneal Transplant Follow-up Study has followed 2311 penetrating keratoplasties for up to 450 days after transplant. A total of 207 failures were observed, including 65 classical rejections and 35 endothelial decompensations. At 12 months, graft survival was 89%, and survival free from rejection was 87%. For surviving grafts, risk of failure reduced from 4.8% in the first 75 days and stabilized after 5 months at 1.2% in each 75-day interval. Risk of rejection initially followed a similar pattern, but then increased after 12 months. Multifactorial analyses accounted for differences in recipient characteristics and interrelationships of donor factors. Donor age, sex, cause of death, and method of corneal storage were not found to influence significantly either time to graft failure or time to first rejection. Grafts in prospectively tissue-typed donor-recipient pairs were generally considered before surgery to be at increased risk of either graft failure or rejection. With due allowance, increasing risk of rejection was associated with increasing numbers of mismatches at HLA-A and HLA-B broad antigens. The opposite was true at HLA-DR broad antigens, where increased risk of rejection was observed with no mismatches.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D009926 Organ Preservation The process by which organs are kept viable outside of the organism from which they were removed (i.e., kept from decay by means of a chemical agent, cooling, or a fluid substitute that mimics the natural state within the organism). Organ Preservations,Preservation, Organ,Preservations, Organ
D005260 Female Females
D005500 Follow-Up Studies Studies in which individuals or populations are followed to assess the outcome of exposures, procedures, or effects of a characteristic, e.g., occurrence of disease. Followup Studies,Follow Up Studies,Follow-Up Study,Followup Study,Studies, Follow-Up,Studies, Followup,Study, Follow-Up,Study, Followup
D006084 Graft Rejection An immune response with both cellular and humoral components, directed against an allogeneic transplant, whose tissue antigens are not compatible with those of the recipient. Transplant Rejection,Rejection, Transplant,Transplantation Rejection,Graft Rejections,Rejection, Graft,Rejection, Transplantation,Rejections, Graft,Rejections, Transplant,Rejections, Transplantation,Transplant Rejections,Transplantation Rejections
D006085 Graft Survival The survival of a graft in a host, the factors responsible for the survival and the changes occurring within the graft during growth in the host. Graft Survivals,Survival, Graft,Survivals, Graft
D006113 United Kingdom Country in northwestern Europe including Great Britain and the northern one-sixth of the island of Ireland, located between the North Sea and north Atlantic Ocean. The capital is London. Great Britain,Isle of Man
D006650 Histocompatibility Testing Identification of the major histocompatibility antigens of transplant DONORS and potential recipients, usually by serological tests. Donor and recipient pairs should be of identical ABO blood group, and in addition should be matched as closely as possible for HISTOCOMPATIBILITY ANTIGENS in order to minimize the likelihood of allograft rejection. (King, Dictionary of Genetics, 4th ed) Crossmatching, Tissue,HLA Typing,Tissue Typing,Crossmatchings, Tissue,HLA Typings,Histocompatibility Testings,Testing, Histocompatibility,Testings, Histocompatibility,Tissue Crossmatching,Tissue Crossmatchings,Tissue Typings,Typing, HLA,Typing, Tissue,Typings, HLA,Typings, Tissue
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
October 1997, The British journal of ophthalmology,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
October 2012, Cornea,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
January 2024, Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.),
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
January 1979, Acta ophthalmologica,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
February 1995, Transplantation proceedings,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
March 1998, Cornea,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
November 2017, Acta ophthalmologica,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
March 2009, Acta ophthalmologica,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
October 2022, Journal of clinical medicine,
A Vail, and S M Gore, and B A Bradley, and D L Easty, and C A Rogers, and W J Armitage
June 1999, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN,
Copied contents to your clipboard!