-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Do the verbal reports of deeply hypnotized Ss truthfully reflect their subjective experiences of hypnotic suggestions? Experiment 1 established that the electrodermal skin conductance response (SCR) provides an effective method for detecting deception in the laboratory equally well in hypnotized and nonhypnotized Ss. In Experiment 2, deeply hypnotized and simulating Ss were administered a number of hypnotic suggestions in a typical hypnotic session, without mention of deception, and were questioned about their experiences while SCR measures were recorded concurrently. Results indicate that 89% of the hypnotized Ss' reports met the criterion for truthfulness, whereas only 35% of the simulators' reports met this criterion. Implications for the theory of hypnosis are discussed.
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
March 1966,
Minerva medica,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
July 1969,
The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
April 1972,
The International journal of clinical and experimental hypnosis,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
January 2007,
The Journal of dermatological treatment,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
December 1975,
Nursing care,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
December 1983,
Minerva medica,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
July 2006,
The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
March 2016,
Science (New York, N.Y.),
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
April 1953,
Monatsschrift fur Psychiatrie und Neurologie,
T Kinnunen, and
H S Zamansky, and
M L Block
November 1890,
Buffalo medical and surgical journal,
