A solution to the following problem is presented: Obtain a principled approach to studying error patterns in sentence-length responses obtained from subjects who were instructed to simply report what a talker had said. The solution is a sequence comparator that performs phoneme-to-phoneme alignment on transcribed stimulus and response sentences. Data for developing and testing the sequence comparator were obtained from 139 normal-hearing subjects who lipread (speechread) 100 sentences and from 15 different subjects who identified nonsense syllables by lipreading. Development of the sequence comparator involved testing two different costs metrics (visemes versus Euclidean distances) and two related comparison algorithms. After alignments with face validity were achieved, a validation experiment was conducted for which measures from random versus true stimulus-response sentence pairs were compared. Measures of phonemes correct and substitution uncertainty were found to be sensitive to the nature of the sentence pairs. In particular, correct phoneme matches were extremely rare in random pairings in comparison with true pairs. Also, an information-theoretic measure of uncertainty for substitutions in true versus random pairings showed that uncertainty was always higher for random than for true pairs.