Screening and the costs of treating colorectal cancer. 1993

D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
Department of Economics, University of Nottingham, UK.

The objective of this paper is to compare the hospital costs of treating patients with colorectal cancers detected as a result of a faecal occult blood screening programme with those of patients whose cancers present symptomatically (control group). Patient-specific cost estimates are made, using case records and hospital accounts, for 360 patients over 3 years. Mean treatment costs for the group offered screening and for the control group are calculated to be 3,179 pounds and 2,966 pounds respectively, although the difference between these means is insignificant. Low treatment costs in the case of screen-detected cancers are largely accounted for by polypectomy with no subsequent readmission; in the control group case, they tend to be accounted for by early patient death. For the sample as a whole, the costs of treating very early-, and very late-, stage cancer are significantly lower than those of treating cancers in the intermediate stages. On the basis of trial evidence, the introduction of mass screening for colorectal cancer is unlikely to give rise to substantial economies in the costs of treatment.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D009367 Neoplasm Staging Methods which attempt to express in replicable terms the extent of the neoplasm in the patient. Cancer Staging,Staging, Neoplasm,Tumor Staging,TNM Classification,TNM Staging,TNM Staging System,Classification, TNM,Classifications, TNM,Staging System, TNM,Staging Systems, TNM,Staging, Cancer,Staging, TNM,Staging, Tumor,System, TNM Staging,Systems, TNM Staging,TNM Classifications,TNM Staging Systems
D003362 Cost-Benefit Analysis A method of comparing the cost of a program with its expected benefits in dollars (or other currency). The benefit-to-cost ratio is a measure of total return expected per unit of money spent. This analysis generally excludes consideration of factors that are not measured ultimately in economic terms. In contrast a cost effectiveness in general compares cost with qualitative outcomes. Cost and Benefit,Cost-Benefit Data,Benefits and Costs,Cost Benefit,Cost Benefit Analysis,Cost-Utility Analysis,Costs and Benefits,Economic Evaluation,Marginal Analysis,Analyses, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Benefit,Analysis, Cost-Utility,Analysis, Marginal,Benefit and Cost,Cost Benefit Analyses,Cost Benefit Data,Cost Utility Analysis,Cost-Benefit Analyses,Cost-Utility Analyses,Data, Cost-Benefit,Economic Evaluations,Evaluation, Economic,Marginal Analyses
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D015179 Colorectal Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the COLON or the RECTUM or both. Risk factors for colorectal cancer include chronic ULCERATIVE COLITIS; FAMILIAL POLYPOSIS COLI; exposure to ASBESTOS; and irradiation of the CERVIX UTERI. Colorectal Cancer,Colorectal Carcinoma,Colorectal Tumors,Neoplasms, Colorectal,Cancer, Colorectal,Cancers, Colorectal,Carcinoma, Colorectal,Carcinomas, Colorectal,Colorectal Cancers,Colorectal Carcinomas,Colorectal Neoplasm,Colorectal Tumor,Neoplasm, Colorectal,Tumor, Colorectal,Tumors, Colorectal
D017048 Health Care Costs The actual costs of providing services related to the delivery of health care, including the costs of procedures, therapies, and medications. It is differentiated from HEALTH EXPENDITURES, which refers to the amount of money paid for the services, and from fees, which refers to the amount charged, regardless of cost. Medical Care Costs,Treatment Costs,Costs, Medical Care,Health Costs,Healthcare Costs,Cost, Health,Cost, Health Care,Cost, Healthcare,Cost, Medical Care,Cost, Treatment,Costs, Health,Costs, Health Care,Costs, Healthcare,Costs, Treatment,Health Care Cost,Health Cost,Healthcare Cost,Medical Care Cost,Treatment Cost

Related Publications

D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
January 1994, European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990),
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
January 1995, International journal of technology assessment in health care,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
January 2019, The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
July 1995, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
December 1996, Gastroenterology,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
December 1996, Gastroenterology,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
December 2010, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
September 1999, Health economics,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
August 2019, Medicine,
D K Whynes, and A R Walker, and J O Chamberlain, and J D Hardcastle
June 2023, The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care,
Copied contents to your clipboard!