Efficiency of an approximate animal model for maternal and direct genetic effects of litter size in swine. 1993

R Roehe, and B W Kennedy
Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

A simulated population of 120 sows and 24 boars in service per year was used to compare genetic evaluations for first-parity litter size and selection response when approximate and complete animal models were used. The complete animal model included maternal and direct effects. The approximate model did not account for covariances between maternal breeding values, or between maternal and direct breeding values, but included a random litter effect of birth of sow. After 10 yr of selection, the overall response (maternal plus direct) was 2.94, 1.61, and .77 pigs using the approximate model and 3.11, 1.65, and .67 pigs using the complete model with equal weighting of maternal and direct genetic effects in the aggregated breeding value for genetic correlations between maternal and direct effects of 0, -.5, and -.9, respectively. Higher reduction was obtained in direct genetic response that was 5, 8, and 19% lower using the approximate model than the complete model for genetic correlations of 0, -.5, and -.9, respectively. Use of the approximate model over 10 yr of selection resulted in a bias of estimation of direct genetic trend of .24, .54, and .48 pigs and in bias in estimated overall response (maternal plus direct) of -.49, .67, and 1.28 pigs for genetic correlations between maternal and direct effects of 0, -.5, and -.9, respectively. Bias in environmental trend estimated from year-season effects was of the same magnitude as the bias in estimated overall response but with an opposite sign. With the approximate model, maternal genetic response was due to a correlation between maternal genetic effects and direct EBV, which for an embedded trait such as maternal genetic effects occurred even when there was no correlation between their true genetic effects. Findings suggested that over the short term the approximate model can be used without substantial loss of overall response but the use of the complete model was recommended because of unbiased estimates in genetic and environmental trend and higher direct genetic response.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008098 Litter Size The number of offspring produced at one birth by a viviparous animal. Litter Sizes,Size, Litter,Sizes, Litter
D008297 Male Males
D008957 Models, Genetic Theoretical representations that simulate the behavior or activity of genetic processes or phenomena. They include the use of mathematical equations, computers, and other electronic equipment. Genetic Models,Genetic Model,Model, Genetic
D009035 Mothers Female parents, human or animal. Mothers' Clubs,Club, Mothers',Clubs, Mothers',Mother,Mother Clubs,Mother's Clubs,Mothers Clubs,Mothers' Club
D001947 Breeding The production of offspring by selective mating or HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC in animals or plants. Breedings
D005260 Female Females
D000818 Animals Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA. Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D012641 Selection, Genetic Differential and non-random reproduction of different genotypes, operating to alter the gene frequencies within a population. Natural Selection,Genetic Selection,Selection, Natural
D013552 Swine Any of various animals that constitute the family Suidae and comprise stout-bodied, short-legged omnivorous mammals with thick skin, usually covered with coarse bristles, a rather long mobile snout, and small tail. Included are the genera Babyrousa, Phacochoerus (wart hogs), and Sus, the latter containing the domestic pig (see SUS SCROFA). Phacochoerus,Pigs,Suidae,Warthogs,Wart Hogs,Hog, Wart,Hogs, Wart,Wart Hog
D014644 Genetic Variation Genotypic differences observed among individuals in a population. Genetic Diversity,Variation, Genetic,Diversity, Genetic,Diversities, Genetic,Genetic Diversities,Genetic Variations,Variations, Genetic

Related Publications

R Roehe, and B W Kennedy
August 1991, Journal of animal science,
R Roehe, and B W Kennedy
June 1992, Journal of animal science,
R Roehe, and B W Kennedy
October 1998, Journal of dairy science,
R Roehe, and B W Kennedy
November 1964, Genetics,
R Roehe, and B W Kennedy
December 1991, Journal of animal science,
Copied contents to your clipboard!