Nineteen congenitally blind subjects (Ss), eleven Ss who went blind later in their life, and 42 control Ss with normal vision were tested in a tactile version of a "mental rotation" task. A specially constructed tactile display was used which enabled a rotation of the alphanumeric symbols in multiples of 60 degrees without any form distortion. Ss had to compare two successively presented symbols regarding whether the second was just a rotated version or also a mirror image of the first. Decision latencies and errors were recorded. Neither of dependent variables reveal any differences between the three groups of subjects. Moreover, the well known linear increase of decision latency as a function of angular disparity could also be observed with the tactile stimuli in all three groups. Both results are consistent with the assumption that mental rotation effects are neither linked to the visual modality nor to a manipulation of visual-analog representations. If the task is solved by so called analog processes then these seem to operate with non-visual spatial representations.