Accurate and early diagnosis of the cause of renal transplant dysfunction is important in successful patient management. Controversy exists as to whether a cyclosporine-specific or -nonspecific method is more predictive of clinical events. In an attempt to answer this question, all episodes of acute renal dysfunction were reviewed in 322 stable renal transplant recipients over a 20-month period. To diagnose the cause of each episode of renal dysfunction, an analysis was made of patient demographics; weight; serum creatinine; cyclosporine dose; cyclosporine level, using a specific method--high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)--and a nonspecific method--fluorescent polarization immunoassay (FPIA); changes in cyclosporine dose; renal biopsy; and response to any therapeutic intervention. There were 138 patients, who developed 279 episodes of renal dysfunction. Causes of renal dysfunction were cyclosporine-related (n = 103), acute rejection (n = 63), extracellular fluid volume depletion (n = 27), other (n = 59), and unknown (n = 27). The mean HPLC cyclosporine level was significantly different in patients with acute cyclosporine toxicity (p < 0.001) and patients with acute rejection (p < 0.001) when compared to those with stable renal function; the mean FPIA cyclosporine levels were not significantly different between the three groups. However, a larger percentage of patients with rejection were subtherapeutic when measured by HPLC, while a higher proportion of patients with nephrotoxicity were above the therapeutic range measured by FPIA.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)