Evaluation of mammographic viewbox luminance, illuminance, and color. 1993

A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
Health Sciences Division, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, New York 14650.

Twenty-three viewboxes were evaluated in six mammography facilities. Luminance and illuminance measurements were made with a recently calibrated photometer. Color temperatures were measured with a Minolta color meter. The average luminance for the 23 viewboxes was 2920 nit (lumen/Sr/m2), the lowest value was 1610 nit, and the highest value was 3630 nit. The average illuminance was 40 lux (lumen/m2), with 6 lux as the lowest value, and 97 lux as the highest. The average color temperature was 8400 K with the lowest value of 4900 K, and the highest of 10,900 K.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008029 Lighting The illumination of an environment and the arrangement of lights to achieve an effect or optimal visibility. Its application is in domestic or in public settings and in medical and non-medical environments. Illumination
D008327 Mammography Radiographic examination of the breast. 3D-Mammography,Digital Breast Tomosynthesis,Digital Mammography,X-ray Breast Tomosynthesis,3D Mammography,3D-Mammographies,Breast Tomosyntheses, Digital,Breast Tomosyntheses, X-ray,Breast Tomosynthesis, Digital,Breast Tomosynthesis, X-ray,Digital Breast Tomosyntheses,Digital Mammographies,Mammographies,Mammographies, Digital,Mammography, Digital,X ray Breast Tomosynthesis,X-ray Breast Tomosyntheses
D003116 Color The visually perceived property of objects created by absorption or reflection of specific wavelengths of light. Colors
D005069 Evaluation Studies as Topic Works about studies that determine the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. Critique,Evaluation Indexes,Evaluation Methodology,Evaluation Report,Evaluation Research,Methodology, Evaluation,Pre-Post Tests,Qualitative Evaluation,Quantitative Evaluation,Theoretical Effectiveness,Use-Effectiveness,Critiques,Effectiveness, Theoretical,Evaluation Methodologies,Evaluation Reports,Evaluation, Qualitative,Evaluation, Quantitative,Evaluations, Qualitative,Evaluations, Quantitative,Indexes, Evaluation,Methodologies, Evaluation,Pre Post Tests,Pre-Post Test,Qualitative Evaluations,Quantitative Evaluations,Report, Evaluation,Reports, Evaluation,Research, Evaluation,Test, Pre-Post,Tests, Pre-Post,Use Effectiveness
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
January 2004, Journal of refractive surgery (Thorofare, N.J. : 1995),
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
November 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
June 2015, Optics express,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
January 2009, Applied optics,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
December 2003, Journal of digital imaging,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
January 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
January 2022, Progress in brain research,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
January 1992, The Annals of physiological anthropology = Seiri Jinruigaku Kenkyukai kaishi,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
September 2007, Psychological science,
A G Haus, and J E Gray, and T R Daly
May 1981, Science (New York, N.Y.),
Copied contents to your clipboard!