OBJECTIVE To study whether factors such as age, duration of pre-perforation symptoms, size of perforation and operative evidence of chronicity could predict recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcers, thus enabling patients at high risk of recurrence to be subjected to definitive surgery instead of simple closure of perforation. METHODS Retrospective. One hundred and fifty-two patients who had undergone simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation in the last 10 years were included in the study. METHODS A postgraduate research and teaching institution. METHODS Patients were subjected to a personal interview and Visick grading of symptoms 1-10 years after simple closure of duodenal ulcer perforation. Ninety of them underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopic evaluation. RESULTS Symptomatic ulcer recurrence rate was 23.1% by Visick grading and 42.2% on endoscopy. Ulcer symptom recurrence rate had no correlation with patient's age, duration of pre-perforation symptoms, or size of perforation, but correlated significantly with operative evidence of chronicity (p < 0.001). However, 7 of 35 symptomatic recurrences would have been missed by the use of this criterion alone. Endoscopic evidence of recurrence also correlated only with operative evidence of chronicity. False positives and false negatives with Visick grading showed that this symptomatic evaluation was unsatisfactory even for selecting patients for further endoscopic workup. CONCLUSIONS Though not infallible, evidence of chronicity of ulcer at laparotomy may be a useful predictor of recurrence of ulcer after simple closure of perforated duodenal ulcer.