Many anesthesiologists are now interested in low flow, closed circuit anesthesia from an economical and environmental point of view. In order to evaluate clinically a newly developed electronically controlled anesthesia machine Engström's ELSA, we compared low flow, closed circuit anesthesia on 38 ASA I-II patients using ELSA, with high flow anesthesia on 12 ASA I-II patients using a conventional anesthesia machine. The results were as follows; 1. We could perform safe and economical low flow, closed circuit anesthesia using ELSA's injection vaporizer and accurate monitoring devices for O2, N2O, CO2 and concentrations of various volatile anesthetic agents. 2. Under low flow anesthesia, isoflurane consumption was 5.3 +/- 1.1 ml.h-1 x Vol.%-1 (mean +/- SE) with ELSA, which is about one fourth of the high flow anesthesia consumption (22.6 +/- 2.1 ml.h-1 x Vol.%-1 (mean +/- SE). 3. Low flow closed circuit anesthesia could maintain significantly higher temperature and humidity compared with high flow anesthesia. 4. Under low flow anesthesia of more than 7hrs, color of soda lime becomes blue, but this does not affect FIO2 nor PaCO2, and the method is clinically safe for patients.