The effect of fetal monitoring on the incidence of cesarean section. 1977

M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky

To determine whether routine fetal monitoring inevitably increases the cesarean section rate, we studied the pertinent literature and analyzed the cesarean sections performed at Evanston Hospital during the last 8 years. Many authors have found a slight to moderate increase in cesarean section rates, whereas others have found no change or a decrease. At Evanston Hospital, the primary cesarean section rate has increased from 2.6% in 1968-1969 to 6.9% in 1974-1975. Only 19.2% of this increase is due to increased fetal distress; the magnitude of the increase is due to changes in other factors, notably, breech deliveries (29.5% of the increase) and "dystocia" (60.2% of the increase). The incidence of cesarean section is controlled by several complex variables, only one of which is fetal monitoring. To describe the fetal monitors as the cause of the increased cesarean section rate is to ignore these other equally profound changes in obstetric technic and philosophy.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008991 Monitoring, Physiologic The continuous measurement of physiological processes, blood pressure, heart rate, renal output, reflexes, respiration, etc., in a patient or experimental animal; includes pharmacologic monitoring, the measurement of administered drugs or their metabolites in the blood, tissues, or urine. Patient Monitoring,Monitoring, Physiological,Physiologic Monitoring,Monitoring, Patient,Physiological Monitoring
D011247 Pregnancy The status during which female mammals carry their developing young (EMBRYOS or FETUSES) in utero before birth, beginning from FERTILIZATION to BIRTH. Gestation,Pregnancies
D001946 Breech Presentation A malpresentation of the FETUS at near term or during OBSTETRIC LABOR with the fetal cephalic pole in the fundus of the UTERUS. There are three types of breech: the complete breech with flexed hips and knees; the incomplete breech with one or both hips partially or fully extended; the frank breech with flexed hips and extended knees. Fetal Presentation, Breech,Labor Presentation, Breech,Presentation, Breech,Complete Breech,Frank Breech Presentation,Incomplete Breech,Breech Fetal Presentation,Breech Labor Presentation,Breech Presentation, Frank,Breech, Complete,Breech, Incomplete,Presentation, Breech Fetal,Presentation, Breech Labor,Presentation, Frank Breech
D002585 Cesarean Section Extraction of the FETUS by means of abdominal HYSTEROTOMY. Abdominal Delivery,Delivery, Abdominal,C-Section (OB),Caesarean Section,Postcesarean Section,Abdominal Deliveries,C Section (OB),C-Sections (OB),Caesarean Sections,Cesarean Sections,Deliveries, Abdominal
D004420 Dystocia Slow or difficult OBSTETRIC LABOR or CHILDBIRTH. Dystocias
D005260 Female Females
D005313 Fetal Death Death of the developing young in utero. BIRTH of a dead FETUS is STILLBIRTH. Fetal Mummification,Fetal Demise,Death, Fetal,Deaths, Fetal,Demise, Fetal,Fetal Deaths,Mummification, Fetal
D005316 Fetal Distress A nonreassuring fetal status (NRFS) indicating that the FETUS is compromised (American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 1988). It can be identified by sub-optimal values in FETAL HEART RATE; oxygenation of FETAL BLOOD; and other parameters. Nonreassuring Fetal Status,Fetal Status, Nonreassuring
D005333 Fetus The unborn young of a viviparous mammal, in the postembryonic period, after the major structures have been outlined. In humans, the unborn young from the end of the eighth week after CONCEPTION until BIRTH, as distinguished from the earlier EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN. Fetal Structures,Fetal Tissue,Fetuses,Mummified Fetus,Retained Fetus,Fetal Structure,Fetal Tissues,Fetus, Mummified,Fetus, Retained,Structure, Fetal,Structures, Fetal,Tissue, Fetal,Tissues, Fetal
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man

Related Publications

M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
June 1981, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
February 1980, Obstetrics and gynecology,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
March 1979, Obstetrics and gynecology,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
November 1976, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
December 1976, Obstetrics and gynecology,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
December 2006, Birth (Berkeley, Calif.),
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
February 1987, The New England journal of medicine,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
July 1954, Ceskoslovenska gynekologie,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
July 1990, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology,
M J Hughey, and R E LaPata, and T W McElin, and R Lussky
July 1975, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!