Results of a policy with arm veins used as the first alternative to an unavailable ipsilateral greater saphenous vein for infrainguinal bypass. 1996

T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
Harvard-Deaconess Surgical Service, New England Deaconess Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA.

OBJECTIVE Aggressive policies for distal bypass and coronary revascularization increase the need to identify alternatives to autologous saphenous vein grafts. We examined the performance of arm vein as the primary alternative to contralateral saphenous vein when the ipsilateral saphenous vein was not available. METHODS A total of 250 arm vein grafts were studied retrospectively in 224 patients (143 men, 81 women, 82.6% with diabetes, mean age 68.3 years) from February 1989 to April 1994. Intraoperative angioscopy was carried out to observe valve lysis, remove abnormalities, and select optimal vein segments. RESULTS A total of 85 primary, 103 repeat, and 62 graft revision procedures were done for limb salvage in 99.2% of the patients. A total of 41 femoropopliteal, 114 femorotibial-pedal, 33 popliteodistal, and 62 jump or interposition grafts were constructed. A total of 199 grafts were single vein, and 51 were composite vein. The source was cephalic vein alone in 50.4%, cephalic and basilic vein in 35.6%, and basilic vein only in 14%. The contralateral saphenous vein as an alternative conduit was available in 97 (38.8%) instances. Interventions guided by angioscopy to "upgrade" the graft were necessary in 51.6%. Overall early patency (< or = 30 days) was 94.8% (n = 13 occlusions). The cumulative primary patency rate at 1 year was 70.6%, the secondary patency rate was 76.9%, and the limb salvage rate was 88.2%. The 3-year patency rate (limb salvage) was 51.9% (92.4%) for primary grafts, 56.7% (67.1%) in revision grafts, and 42.4% (79.9%) in repeat grafts. In 22.7% (22 of 97) the available contralateral saphenous vein was used for distal revascularization within the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS Arm veins are an easily accessible autologous conduit of sufficient length to reach the midtibial level. Excellent patency rates allow durable limb salvage in otherwise difficult circumstances. Vein configuration and splicing do not affect patency rates, but vein quality and repeat operations do. Angioscopy is a valuable adjunct to upgrade graft quality. The contralateral saphenous should be saved for subsequent contralateral revascularization or coronary artery bypass grafting.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007511 Ischemia A hypoperfusion of the BLOOD through an organ or tissue caused by a PATHOLOGIC CONSTRICTION or obstruction of its BLOOD VESSELS, or an absence of BLOOD CIRCULATION. Ischemias
D007866 Leg The inferior part of the lower extremity between the KNEE and the ANKLE. Legs
D008297 Male Males
D008722 Methods A series of steps taken in order to conduct research. Techniques,Methodological Studies,Methodological Study,Procedures,Studies, Methodological,Study, Methodological,Method,Procedure,Technique
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D012086 Reoperation A repeat operation for the same condition in the same patient due to disease progression or recurrence, or as followup to failed previous surgery. Revision, Joint,Revision, Surgical,Surgery, Repeat,Surgical Revision,Repeat Surgery,Revision Surgery,Joint Revision,Revision Surgeries,Surgery, Revision
D005260 Female Females
D006083 Graft Occlusion, Vascular Obstruction of flow in biological or prosthetic vascular grafts. Graft Restenosis, Vascular,Vascular Graft Occlusion,Vascular Graft Restenosis,Graft Restenoses, Vascular,Occlusion, Vascular Graft,Restenosis, Vascular Graft
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults

Related Publications

T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
December 1993, Journal of vascular surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
August 2001, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
May 2005, Annals of vascular surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
September 1994, Journal of vascular surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
October 1986, Journal of the South Carolina Medical Association (1975),
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
June 2002, Journal of vascular surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
September 1994, Journal of vascular surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
December 1996, Journal of vascular surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
May 1978, The Annals of thoracic surgery,
T J Hölzenbein, and F B Pomposelli, and A Miller, and M A Contreras, and G W Gibbons, and D R Campbell, and D V Freeman, and F W LoGerfo
March 2023, Vascular specialist international,
Copied contents to your clipboard!