Hymenoptera sting challenge of 348 patients: relation to subsequent field stings. 1996

H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
Department of Internal Medicine, Eemland Hospital, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.

BACKGROUND Patients with a history of a serious anaphylactic reaction after a Hymenoptera sting are usually given venom immunotherapy. Because the natural history of Hymenoptera sting anaphylaxis is often of a declining severity, there is a chance of overtreatment. OBJECTIVE Identification of patients at risk for a future anaphylactic reaction may reduce the number of patients who need venom immunotherapy. METHODS We investigated the relation between the grade of hypersensitivity to an in-hospital sting challenge and the reaction to a subsequent accidental field sting. From 1982 through 1992, 348 patients with mild or no symptoms after a sting challenge were not given venom immunotherapy. All patients were asked by letter whether they had experienced a subsequent field sting. In case of a sting, the severity of the reaction was further evaluated. RESULTS Information could be obtained from 327 patients: 129 had been re-stung, and 110 of them had only had a local reaction. Thirteen patients had experienced mild systemic symptoms, and six patients had experienced serious manifestations. In two of the latter group hypotension was observed. CONCLUSIONS In 95% of patients with a previous anaphylactic reaction, the result of the in-hospital sting challenge provided a good prediction of tolerance to a subsequent Hymenoptera field sting.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D007299 Insect Bites and Stings Bites and stings inflicted by insects. Insect Bites,Insect Stings,Bite, Insect,Bites, Insect,Insect Bite,Insect Sting,Sting, Insect,Stings, Insect
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000707 Anaphylaxis An acute hypersensitivity reaction due to exposure to a previously encountered ANTIGEN. The reaction may include rapidly progressing URTICARIA, respiratory distress, vascular collapse, systemic SHOCK, and death. Anaphylactic Reaction,Anaphylactoid Reaction,Anaphylactoid Shock,Shock, Anaphylactic,Anaphylactic Reactions,Anaphylactic Shock,Anaphylactoid Reactions,Reaction, Anaphylactic,Reaction, Anaphylactoid,Shock, Anaphylactoid
D000818 Animals Unicellular or multicellular, heterotrophic organisms, that have sensation and the power of voluntary movement. Under the older five kingdom paradigm, Animalia was one of the kingdoms. Under the modern three domain model, Animalia represents one of the many groups in the domain EUKARYOTA. Animal,Metazoa,Animalia
D001514 Bee Venoms Toxins obtained from Apis mellifera (honey bee) and related species. They contain various enzymes, polypeptide toxins, and other substances, some of which are allergenic or immunogenic or both. These venoms were formerly used in rheumatism to stimulate the pituitary-adrenal system. Apis Venoms,Honeybee Venom,Honeybee Venoms,Apitoxin,Bee Venom,Venom, Bee,Venom, Honeybee,Venoms, Apis,Venoms, Bee,Venoms, Honeybee

Related Publications

H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
November 1991, Lancet (London, England),
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
February 1995, The Journal of pediatrics,
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
January 2006, Journal of investigational allergology & clinical immunology,
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
May 1974, JAMA,
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
January 2007, Przeglad lekarski,
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
November 2012, Pediatrics in review,
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
February 1988, Cutis,
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
November 2006, Clinical techniques in small animal practice,
H K van Halteren, and P W van der Linden, and S A Burgers, and A K Bartelink
July 1997, The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!