BIOMAT Database Logo BIOMAT Database Logo

[Evaluation system in assessing radiological examinations of clinical significance for the patient]. 1996

P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institut für radiologisch-physikalische Tumordiagnostik, Universitätsklinik für Radiodiagnostik Wien.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to test a scoring system and its utility for the assessment of the clinical significance of radiological examinations. METHODS The reports of all diagnostic studies obtained in patients with a clinical suspicion of pancreatitis, urinary tract obstruction, biliary or gallbladder diseases, ileus and gastrointestinal perforation were scored prospectively in 4 categories from 0 to 3. These categories were related to the ability to establish a definite diagnosis, to exclude suspected disease, to influence further diagnostic work-up and therapeutic decision-making. RESULTS This scoring system showed significant differences of the efficacy of different imaging modalities in these 5 clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS This scoring system was helpful to determine the clinical significance of radiological examinations.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D010195 Pancreatitis INFLAMMATION of the PANCREAS. Pancreatitis is classified as acute unless there are computed tomographic or endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic findings of CHRONIC PANCREATITIS (International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, 1992). The two most common forms of acute pancreatitis are ALCOHOLIC PANCREATITIS and gallstone pancreatitis. Acute Edematous Pancreatitis,Acute Pancreatitis,Pancreatic Parenchyma with Edema,Pancreatic Parenchymal Edema,Pancreatitis, Acute,Pancreatitis, Acute Edematous,Peripancreatic Fat Necrosis,Acute Edematous Pancreatitides,Acute Pancreatitides,Edema, Pancreatic Parenchymal,Edematous Pancreatitides, Acute,Edematous Pancreatitis, Acute,Fat Necrosis, Peripancreatic,Necrosis, Peripancreatic Fat,Pancreatic Parenchymal Edemas,Pancreatitides, Acute,Pancreatitides, Acute Edematous,Parenchymal Edema, Pancreatic,Peripancreatic Fat Necroses
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D011786 Quality Control A system for verifying and maintaining a desired level of quality in a product or process by careful planning, use of proper equipment, continued inspection, and corrective action as required. (Random House Unabridged Dictionary, 2d ed) Control, Quality,Controls, Quality,Quality Controls
D011859 Radiography Examination of any part of the body for diagnostic purposes by means of X-RAYS or GAMMA RAYS, recording the image on a sensitized surface (such as photographic film). Radiology, Diagnostic X-Ray,Roentgenography,X-Ray, Diagnostic,Diagnostic X-Ray,Diagnostic X-Ray Radiology,X-Ray Radiology, Diagnostic,Diagnostic X Ray,Diagnostic X Ray Radiology,Diagnostic X-Rays,Radiology, Diagnostic X Ray,X Ray Radiology, Diagnostic,X Ray, Diagnostic,X-Rays, Diagnostic
D003937 Diagnosis, Differential Determination of which one of two or more diseases or conditions a patient is suffering from by systematically comparing and contrasting results of diagnostic measures. Diagnoses, Differential,Differential Diagnoses,Differential Diagnosis
D004630 Emergencies Situations or conditions requiring immediate intervention to avoid serious adverse results. Emergency
D005069 Evaluation Studies as Topic Works about studies that determine the effectiveness or value of processes, personnel, and equipment, or the material on conducting such studies. Critique,Evaluation Indexes,Evaluation Methodology,Evaluation Report,Evaluation Research,Methodology, Evaluation,Pre-Post Tests,Qualitative Evaluation,Quantitative Evaluation,Theoretical Effectiveness,Use-Effectiveness,Critiques,Effectiveness, Theoretical,Evaluation Methodologies,Evaluation Reports,Evaluation, Qualitative,Evaluation, Quantitative,Evaluations, Qualitative,Evaluations, Quantitative,Indexes, Evaluation,Methodologies, Evaluation,Pre Post Tests,Pre-Post Test,Qualitative Evaluations,Quantitative Evaluations,Report, Evaluation,Reports, Evaluation,Research, Evaluation,Test, Pre-Post,Tests, Pre-Post,Use Effectiveness
D005260 Female Females

Related Publications

P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
Comparison of four methods for assessing patient effective dose from radiological examinations.
September 2002, Medical physics,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
iPad-based patient briefing for radiological examinations-a clinical trial.
August 2014, Journal of digital imaging,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
[Gerontological evaluation of knee arthroses through radiological and clinical examinations].
January 1973, Zeitschrift fur Alternsforschung,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
Gastric polyps: radiological evaluation and clinical significance.
June 1985, Radiology,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
DEVELOPMENT OF EXAMINATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION OF RADIOLOGICAL HEALTH PERSONNEL.
June 1965, Health physics,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
The diagnostic significance of the various radiological examinations in adrenal disease.
May 1978, Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai zasshi. Nippon acta radiologica,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
Clinical details and radiological examinations.
January 1990, The Medical journal of Australia,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
Clinical details and radiological examinations.
April 1990, The Medical journal of Australia,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
Studies of patient doses in interventional radiological examinations.
January 2010, Radiation protection dosimetry,
P Pokieser, and H Wohlschlager, and M M Hirschl, and D Seidler, and P Böhm, and J Kettenbach, and T Helbich, and A Laggner, and V Scheiber, and G H Mostbeck
[Clinical-radiological evaluation of X-ray examinations in cases of otosclerosis (author's transl)].
January 1977, Polski przeglad radiologii i medycyny nuklearnej,
Copied contents to your clipboard!