Variability of consecutive in vivo MR flow measurements in the main portal vein. 1996

A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

OBJECTIVE The variability of consecutive cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements could significantly affect their use for clinical decisions, especially during provocative testing. The purposes of this study were to determine the normal variability of flow and consecutive flow measurements in the main portal vein on MR images and to determine how intraobserver variability, interobserver variability, and MR imager variability affect these measurements. METHODS MR flow measurements were acquired four consecutive times at the same location in the main portal vein of 12 subjects and three consecutive times at the same location in a nonpulsatile vessel model. All acquisitions were completed within 10 min. All main portal vein MR data sets were evaluated manually in a blinded review by two independent observers during three separate sessions spaced a mean of 4.5 weeks apart. Flow model data sets were evaluated during a single session by one observer. Variabilities were subsequently calculated by a components-of-variance analysis and by the coefficient of variation (SD/mean x 100). RESULTS Of the total variance, 90% was due to flow variability among subjects (intersubject), 6% to flow variability within one subject (intrasubject), 2% to intraobserver variability, and 2% to interobserver variability. The coefficient of variation of consecutive MR portal vein flow measurements within a single subject was 11% +/- 5% (range, 3-23%). Intra- and interobserver variabilities were 5% +/- 2% (range, 1-11%) and 4% +/- 4% (range, 0-17%), respectively. MR imager variability was 1% +/- 1% (range, 0-2%). CONCLUSIONS The mean variability of consecutive cine phase-contrast MR flow measurements in the main portal vein is 11% +/- 5% and could affect research and clinical protocols that employ this technique.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011169 Portal Vein A short thick vein formed by union of the superior mesenteric vein and the splenic vein. Portal Veins,Vein, Portal,Veins, Portal
D001783 Blood Flow Velocity A value equal to the total volume flow divided by the cross-sectional area of the vascular bed. Blood Flow Velocities,Flow Velocities, Blood,Flow Velocity, Blood,Velocities, Blood Flow,Velocity, Blood Flow
D005260 Female Females
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D015588 Observer Variation The failure by the observer to measure or identify a phenomenon accurately, which results in an error. Sources for this may be due to the observer's missing an abnormality, or to faulty technique resulting in incorrect test measurement, or to misinterpretation of the data. Two varieties are inter-observer variation (the amount observers vary from one another when reporting on the same material) and intra-observer variation (the amount one observer varies between observations when reporting more than once on the same material). Bias, Observer,Interobserver Variation,Intraobserver Variation,Observer Bias,Inter-Observer Variability,Inter-Observer Variation,Interobserver Variability,Intra-Observer Variability,Intra-Observer Variation,Intraobserver Variability,Inter Observer Variability,Inter Observer Variation,Inter-Observer Variabilities,Inter-Observer Variations,Interobserver Variabilities,Interobserver Variations,Intra Observer Variability,Intra Observer Variation,Intra-Observer Variabilities,Intra-Observer Variations,Intraobserver Variabilities,Intraobserver Variations,Observer Variations,Variabilities, Inter-Observer,Variabilities, Interobserver,Variabilities, Intra-Observer,Variabilities, Intraobserver,Variability, Inter-Observer,Variability, Interobserver,Variability, Intra-Observer,Variability, Intraobserver,Variation, Inter-Observer,Variation, Interobserver,Variation, Intra-Observer,Variation, Intraobserver,Variation, Observer,Variations, Inter-Observer,Variations, Interobserver,Variations, Intra-Observer,Variations, Intraobserver,Variations, Observer
D019028 Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine A type of imaging technique used primarily in the field of cardiology. By coordinating the fast gradient-echo MRI sequence with retrospective ECG-gating, numerous short time frames evenly spaced in the cardiac cycle are produced. These images are laced together in a cinematic display so that wall motion of the ventricles, valve motion, and blood flow patterns in the heart and great vessels can be visualized. Cine MRI,Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Cine MRIs,MRI, Cine,MRIs, Cine
D019047 Phantoms, Imaging Devices or objects in various imaging techniques used to visualize or enhance visualization by simulating conditions encountered in the procedure. Phantoms are used very often in procedures employing or measuring x-irradiation or radioactive material to evaluate performance. Phantoms often have properties similar to human tissue. Water demonstrates absorbing properties similar to normal tissue, hence water-filled phantoms are used to map radiation levels. Phantoms are used also as teaching aids to simulate real conditions with x-ray or ultrasonic machines. (From Iturralde, Dictionary and Handbook of Nuclear Medicine and Clinical Imaging, 1990) Phantoms, Radiographic,Phantoms, Radiologic,Radiographic Phantoms,Radiologic Phantoms,Phantom, Radiographic,Phantom, Radiologic,Radiographic Phantom,Radiologic Phantom,Imaging Phantom,Imaging Phantoms,Phantom, Imaging

Related Publications

A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
February 1997, Journal of hepatology,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
January 2013, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
May 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
March 1999, Investigative radiology,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
April 1990, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
April 1993, Radiology,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
November 1993, Clinical radiology,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
May 2004, The British journal of surgery,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
July 1980, Clinical radiology,
A K Hara, and D J Burkart, and C D Johnson, and J P Felmlee, and R L Ehman, and D M Ilstrup, and W S Harmsen
January 2008, Voprosy onkologii,
Copied contents to your clipboard!