-transparent.png){kind=logo}
An intercomparison programme for expert assessment was carried out as part of quality assurance for the public health departments in Bavaria. A file documenting medical diagnoses and reports of a patient was presented to medical doctors in a district of Bavaria and in the Academy for Public Health Services in Munich for assessment. The participation was voluntary and anonymous. The case presented was an obese man who wanted to become a civil servant. The doctors were asked to give an expert assessment of his health. Four criteria were used to evaluate the assessments: the assessment, its conclusiveness, the documentation and the epicrisis. 54 out of 100 doctors asked participated. On average all criteria were adequately fulfilled. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of an intercomparison programme for expert assessments in the field of social medicine. Our results show that an intercomparison programme for expert assessments could form part of quality assurance.
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
February 1990,
Das Offentliche Gesundheitswesen,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
October 2017,
Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
December 2013,
Frontiers in oncology,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
December 1981,
Hospitals,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
January 1976,
Hospital topics,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
October 1968,
Klinische Wochenschrift,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
September 2003,
Critical reviews in oncology/hematology,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
May 1996,
Seminars in reproductive endocrinology,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
March 2013,
Journal of the National Cancer Institute,
P Lederer, and
A Weber, and
H Strebl, and
K Schmid
March 2024,
The journal of vascular access,
