Donor-recipient histocompatibility, as evaluated by the HLA matching results, plays an important role in the outcome of renal transplants, although much controversy surrounds the benefit of kidney allocation based on HLA typing. In this report HLA matching and survival data on 1,342 transplants performed at the University of California at San Francisco between 1984 and 1992 and treated uniformly by quadruple immunosuppression were analyzed in relation to the recipient's age. With respect to the influence of the increasing number of mismatches from 0 to 6, the analysis revealed decreasing 3-year graft survival rates as follows: 85.4%; 87.3%; 71.3%; 78.2%; 75.8%; 70.9% and 67.5%. Whereas the impact of cold ischemia time and histocompatibility was equally important during the 3-year postoperative period, the essential positive influence of good HLA matching on the long-term graft survival was demonstrated. The children aged between 5 and 18 years were identified as a high-risk group by the analysis, HLA-A incompatibility being attributed to poor graft survival in this age group. With respect to the effect of HLA-A histoincompatibility, the data provide evidence that HLA-A matching results seem to play an important role in graft survival in children, whereas transplants well matched in terms of HLA-B did well in adult recipients. No age difference in the impact of HLA-DR could be detected. In conclusion, HLA matching is still essential. It seems that there are differences in the impact of HLA loci in relation to the recipient's age.