Perceptual latency and complex random-dot stereograms. 1995

M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, UK.

Naive observers of random-dot stereograms depicting complex surfaces often find that they require several tens of seconds before the impression of depth emerges. With practice, however, perception times often decrease markedly: perceptual learning occurs. Current explanations of these effects were assessed in two experiments. In the first experiment the perception times of naive observers for random-dot stereograms which depicted the same complex shape but contained different ranges of disparity were measured. In the second experiment the minimum times required by experienced observers to perceive a given complex shape in stereograms that contained different ranges of disparity were determined. Perception times for the naive observers were all very fast (<3 s) and showed no evidence of perceptual learning. There was no effect of disparity range on perception times in either experiment. It was found that very large-disparity (80 min arc) complex stereograms could be perceived quickly, even by naive observers. It is concluded that the long initial latencies previously reported are not due to surface complexity nor to the range of disparities present. Other factors. such as dot size, dot density, and the correlation of the stereo images, appear to be important determinants of efficient stereoscopic performance when viewing complex random-dot stereograms.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D003867 Depth Perception Perception of three-dimensionality. Stereopsis,Stereoscopic Vision,Depth Perceptions,Perception, Depth,Perceptions, Depth,Stereopses,Stereoscopic Visions,Vision, Stereoscopic,Visions, Stereoscopic
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D015357 Vision Disparity The difference between two images on the retina when looking at a visual stimulus. This occurs since the two retinas do not have the same view of the stimulus because of the location of our eyes. Thus the left eye does not get exactly the same view as the right eye. Binocular Disparity,Fixation Disparity,Ocular Disparity,Parallax, Ocular,Retinal Disparity,Visual Disparity,Binocular Disparities,Disparities, Binocular,Disparities, Fixation,Disparities, Ocular,Disparities, Retinal,Disparities, Vision,Disparities, Visual,Disparity, Binocular,Disparity, Fixation,Disparity, Ocular,Disparity, Retinal,Disparity, Vision,Disparity, Visual,Fixation Disparities,Ocular Disparities,Ocular Parallax,Retinal Disparities,Vision Disparities,Visual Disparities

Related Publications

M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
January 2010, Perception,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
July 2007, Vision research,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
February 1996, Vision research,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
January 1992, Perception,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
November 1975, American journal of ophthalmology,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
October 1986, The British journal of ophthalmology,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
January 1979, Perception,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
January 1999, Perception,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
January 1987, Biological cybernetics,
M F Bradshaw, and B J Rogers, and B De Bruyn
January 1976, Vision research,
Copied contents to your clipboard!