-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Treatment effectiveness for drug dependance is evaluated and compared with success rates reported in the literature. Program differences and varying follow-up procedures make assessment difficult. Identical pre- and posttreatment quantitative adjustment indices are recommended in order to improve the measurement of improvement. Education and length of stay in treatment are among the most important predictors of posttreatment drug usage and work akjustment. Education and improved treatment success with lower class youth are discussed.
Related Publications
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
March 1982,
Tijdschrift voor ziekenverpleging,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
July 1998,
Addiction (Abingdon, England),
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
January 1974,
The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
September 1974,
The Journal of practical nursing,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
January 1989,
Addictive behaviors,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
June 1978,
Psychological reports,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
March 1981,
British journal of addiction,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
January 2003,
The American journal on addictions,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
January 1974,
The American journal of drug and alcohol abuse,
H S Cutter, and
A Samaraweera, and
B Price, and
D Haskell, and
C Schaeffer
January 1984,
Journal of psychoactive drugs,
