The existence of stressor-specific induction programs of heat shock proteins (hsps) leads us to analyze the possible occurrence of a stressor-specific tolerance induced by either heat shock, arsenite, or cadmium. As a measure of this tolerance re-induction of hsps was studied. In this paper, we tested whether the refractory state is either valid for each specific hsp (implying independent regulation of every member of the heat shock protein family) or extends from small subsets of the hsp-family to even larger groups of proteins (indicating a more common denominator in their regulation). (re-)induction of hsps does not seem to be regulated at the level of each individual hsp since differences in induced synthesis of hsps between two stressor conditions are not supplemented systematically upon the sequential application of the two stressors. The most notable example in this respect is hsp60. A pretreatment with cadmium, which hardly induces synthesis of this hsp, does induce a tolerance to (re)-induction by heat shock, which normally induces hsp60. This suggests the existence of a more common denominator regulating the coordinate expression of at least some hsps. From our data we conclude that the degree, but not the pattern, of hsp re-induction is influenced by the type of stressor used in the pretreatment. The pattern of hsps induced by a secondary applied stressor still shows most of its stressor-specificity and seems to be independent of any pretreatment. The possible implications of stressor-specificity are discussed.