Sensitivity of the jaw-jerk reflex in patients with myogenous temporomandibular disorder. 1996

F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
Department of Oral Function, Academic Centre for Dentistry, ACTA, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Changes in the activity of human jaw-elevator muscles related to the mandibular stretch (jaw-jerk) reflex could be involved in the aetiology of temporomandibular disorders (TMD). In order to investigate whether there are differences in the sensitivity of the jaw-jerk reflex between myogenous TMD patients (n = 10) and gender- and age-matched controls (n = 10), jaw-jerk reflexes were elicited under standardized conditions. By measuring the reflex with bipolar surface electromyography (EMG), reflex sensitivity was determined from relations between reflex amplitude and jaw displacement from the masseter and the anterior temporalis muscles. Reflex amplitude and background EMG activity were normalized with respect to the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) to correct for differences in the thickness of soft tissues overlying the muscle or in electrode placement. In addition to normalization with respect to MVC, for the patients, normalization was also applied with respect to a MVC that was scaled by multiplying values by the ratio of the mean MVC of controls to the mean MVC of patients. At a constant level of background EMG activity, the reflex sensitivity can be determined from the slope (reflex gain) and x-intercept (reflex threshold) of the reflex amplitude-jaw displacement relation. No significant differences between patients and controls were found for the gain or threshold values of either the masseter or the anterior temporalis muscles with a univariate analysis of variance. It is concluded that jaw-jerk reflex sensitivity is not significantly changed in myogenous TMD patients. Therefore, the fusimotor system probably does not play a part in the perpetuating myogenous TMD.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008334 Mandible The largest and strongest bone of the FACE constituting the lower jaw. It supports the lower teeth. Mylohyoid Groove,Mylohyoid Ridge,Groove, Mylohyoid,Grooves, Mylohyoid,Mandibles,Mylohyoid Grooves,Mylohyoid Ridges,Ridge, Mylohyoid,Ridges, Mylohyoid
D008406 Masseter Muscle A masticatory muscle whose action is closing the jaws. Masseter Muscles,Muscle, Masseter,Muscles, Masseter
D009119 Muscle Contraction A process leading to shortening and/or development of tension in muscle tissue. Muscle contraction occurs by a sliding filament mechanism whereby actin filaments slide inward among the myosin filaments. Inotropism,Muscular Contraction,Contraction, Muscle,Contraction, Muscular,Contractions, Muscle,Contractions, Muscular,Inotropisms,Muscle Contractions,Muscular Contractions
D009470 Muscle Spindles Skeletal muscle structures that function as the MECHANORECEPTORS responsible for the stretch or myotactic reflex (REFLEX, STRETCH). They are composed of a bundle of encapsulated SKELETAL MUSCLE FIBERS, i.e., the intrafusal fibers (nuclear bag 1 fibers, nuclear bag 2 fibers, and nuclear chain fibers) innervated by SENSORY NEURONS. Muscle Stretch Receptors,Neuromuscular Spindles,Receptors, Stretch, Muscle,Stretch Receptors, Muscle,Muscle Spindle,Muscle Stretch Receptor,Neuromuscular Spindle,Receptor, Muscle Stretch,Receptors, Muscle Stretch,Spindle, Muscle,Spindle, Neuromuscular,Spindles, Muscle,Spindles, Neuromuscular,Stretch Receptor, Muscle
D012026 Reflex, Stretch Reflex contraction of a muscle in response to stretching, which stimulates muscle proprioceptors. Reflex, Tendon,Stretch Reflex,Tendon Reflex
D004056 Differential Threshold The smallest difference which can be discriminated between two stimuli or one which is barely above the threshold. Difference Limen,Just-Noticeable Difference,Weber-Fechner Law,Difference Limens,Difference, Just-Noticeable,Differences, Just-Noticeable,Differential Thresholds,Just Noticeable Difference,Just-Noticeable Differences,Law, Weber-Fechner,Limen, Difference,Limens, Difference,Threshold, Differential,Thresholds, Differential,Weber Fechner Law
D004576 Electromyography Recording of the changes in electric potential of muscle by means of surface or needle electrodes. Electromyogram,Surface Electromyography,Electromyograms,Electromyographies,Electromyographies, Surface,Electromyography, Surface,Surface Electromyographies
D005246 Feedback A mechanism of communication within a system in that the input signal generates an output response which returns to influence the continued activity or productivity of that system. Feedbacks
D005260 Female Females

Related Publications

F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
September 1992, Journal of oral rehabilitation,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
August 2000, Journal of oral rehabilitation,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
January 1983, Archives of oral biology,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
September 2005, Neuroreport,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
October 1979, Scandinavian journal of dental research,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
September 1972, Kokubyo Gakkai zasshi. The Journal of the Stomatological Society, Japan,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
November 2023, Clinical oral investigations,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
October 2000, Journal of oral rehabilitation,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
April 1993, Archives italiennes de biologie,
F Lobbezoo, and H W van der Glas, and A van der Bilt, and R Buchner, and F Bosman
December 1993, Archives of oral biology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!