[Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography for screening of prostatic cancer]. 1996

M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
Department of Urology, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine.

Between January, 1994 and December, 1995, we performed systematic biopsy of the prostate in a secondary study of our mass screening program for prostatic diseases. Of the 3,219 males over 55 years of age, 25 patients with prostatic cancer (11 in stage B, 10 in stage C and 4 in stage D) were detected. Herein, the diagnostic accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography (TRS) was compared with that of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and digital rectal examination (DRE). The sensitivity of TRS, PSA and DRE for cancer were 80%, 84% and 64% respectively. The specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy of TRS for cancer were higher than those of PSA or DRE.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008403 Mass Screening Organized periodic procedures performed on large groups of people for the purpose of detecting disease. Screening,Mass Screenings,Screening, Mass,Screenings,Screenings, Mass
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D010808 Physical Examination Systematic and thorough inspection of the patient for physical signs of disease or abnormality. Physical Exam,Examination, Physical,Physical Examinations and Diagnoses,Exam, Physical,Examinations, Physical,Exams, Physical,Physical Examinations,Physical Exams
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011471 Prostatic Neoplasms Tumors or cancer of the PROSTATE. Cancer of Prostate,Prostate Cancer,Cancer of the Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostate,Neoplasms, Prostatic,Prostate Neoplasms,Prostatic Cancer,Cancer, Prostate,Cancer, Prostatic,Cancers, Prostate,Cancers, Prostatic,Neoplasm, Prostate,Neoplasm, Prostatic,Prostate Cancers,Prostate Neoplasm,Prostatic Cancers,Prostatic Neoplasm
D012007 Rectum The distal segment of the LARGE INTESTINE, between the SIGMOID COLON and the ANAL CANAL. Rectums
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity

Related Publications

M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
January 1987, Progress in clinical and biological research,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
September 1995, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
May 2024, BJU international,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
January 1995, Orvosi hetilap,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
January 1983, Ultrasound in medicine & biology,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
June 1990, Urologic nursing,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
December 1983, British journal of urology,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
January 1997, European urology,
M Watanabe, and M Saitoh, and H Watanabe
December 1986, The Journal of urology,
Copied contents to your clipboard!