-transparent.png){kind=logo}
Perceptual augmentation and reduction were considered contrasting styles of Stimulus Intensity Modulation. Differences in perceived exertion between augmenters and reducers were determined for three cycle ergometer work loads. Subjects were 20 males having similar physiological characteristics. Stimulus Intensity Modulation was determined by kinesthetic figural aftereffect. Augmenters rated their perceptions of physical exertion to be more intense than reducers at 450, 750 and 1050 kpm/min. Differences in physiological responses between augmenters and reducers were not significant at the three work loads. Style of Stimulus Intensity Modulation appeared differentially to influence perceived exertion at the work levels studied.
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
March 1986,
British journal of sports medicine,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
December 1980,
Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
September 1981,
The Physician and sportsmedicine,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
June 2004,
Perceptual and motor skills,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
November 1977,
Journal of studies on alcohol,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
November 2023,
Perception,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
December 2001,
Perceptual and motor skills,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
January 2017,
Home healthcare now,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
February 2009,
European journal of applied physiology,
R J Robertson, and
R L Gillespie, and
E Hiatt, and
K D Rose
June 2003,
European journal of applied physiology,
