Clinical significance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) compared to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). 1997

R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
Dept. of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Humboldt University of Berlin, Germany.

OBJECTIVE The clinical importance of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) as a noninvasive diagnostic modality for investigation of the biliary tree and pancreatic duct system is under debate. Using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) as the gold standard, this study determined in a prospective, blinded fashion the sensitivity and further statistic values of MRCP findings for evaluation of the biliary and pancreatic tract. METHODS Seventy-eight patients referred for ERCP were studied prospectively with MRCP and ERCP during a 12-month period. All images were interpreted on a blinded basis by two radiologists. Any dilations, strictures, and intraductal abnormalities were recorded and correlated with the clinical diagnoses. RESULTS MRCP images of diagnostic quality were obtained in 76 of the 78 patients (97%). Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) showed sensitivities (and positive predictive values) of 71% (62%) for recognition of normal bile ducts, 83% (91%) for recognition of dilation, 85% (100%) for recognition of strictures, 77% (91%) for correct stricture location, and 80% (100%) for diagnosing bile duct calculi. In addition, the sensitivity of MRC in classifying benign and malignant strictures was 50% and 80%, respectively. The statistical values (sensitivity and positive predictive value) for magnetic resonance pancreatography findings were determined for the recognition of normal pancreatic ducts (33% and 50%), recognition of dilation (62% and 100%), recognition of strictures (76% and 87%) and correct location (66% and 100%), diagnosis of benign strictures (87% and 87%) and malignant strictures (60% and 75%), and for diagnosing pancreatic duct stones (60% and 100%). CONCLUSIONS MRCP is capable of providing diagnostic information equivalent to ERCP in many patients, and should be applied whenever established techniques provide no results, or inadequate results.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008279 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Non-invasive method of demonstrating internal anatomy based on the principle that atomic nuclei in a strong magnetic field absorb pulses of radiofrequency energy and emit them as radiowaves which can be reconstructed into computerized images. The concept includes proton spin tomographic techniques. Chemical Shift Imaging,MR Tomography,MRI Scans,MRI, Functional,Magnetic Resonance Image,Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Functional,Magnetization Transfer Contrast Imaging,NMR Imaging,NMR Tomography,Tomography, NMR,Tomography, Proton Spin,fMRI,Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging,Imaging, Chemical Shift,Proton Spin Tomography,Spin Echo Imaging,Steady-State Free Precession MRI,Tomography, MR,Zeugmatography,Chemical Shift Imagings,Echo Imaging, Spin,Echo Imagings, Spin,Functional MRI,Functional MRIs,Image, Magnetic Resonance,Imaging, Magnetic Resonance,Imaging, NMR,Imaging, Spin Echo,Imagings, Chemical Shift,Imagings, Spin Echo,MRI Scan,MRIs, Functional,Magnetic Resonance Images,Resonance Image, Magnetic,Scan, MRI,Scans, MRI,Shift Imaging, Chemical,Shift Imagings, Chemical,Spin Echo Imagings,Steady State Free Precession MRI
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D010179 Pancreas A nodular organ in the ABDOMEN that contains a mixture of ENDOCRINE GLANDS and EXOCRINE GLANDS. The small endocrine portion consists of the ISLETS OF LANGERHANS secreting a number of hormones into the blood stream. The large exocrine portion (EXOCRINE PANCREAS) is a compound acinar gland that secretes several digestive enzymes into the pancreatic ductal system that empties into the DUODENUM.
D010182 Pancreatic Diseases Pathological processes of the PANCREAS. Disease, Pancreatic,Diseases, Pancreatic,Pancreatic Disease
D011237 Predictive Value of Tests In screening and diagnostic tests, the probability that a person with a positive test is a true positive (i.e., has the disease), is referred to as the predictive value of a positive test; whereas, the predictive value of a negative test is the probability that the person with a negative test does not have the disease. Predictive value is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Negative Predictive Value,Positive Predictive Value,Predictive Value Of Test,Predictive Values Of Tests,Negative Predictive Values,Positive Predictive Values,Predictive Value, Negative,Predictive Value, Positive
D011446 Prospective Studies Observation of a population for a sufficient number of persons over a sufficient number of years to generate incidence or mortality rates subsequent to the selection of the study group. Prospective Study,Studies, Prospective,Study, Prospective
D002648 Child A person 6 to 12 years of age. An individual 2 to 5 years old is CHILD, PRESCHOOL. Children
D002675 Child, Preschool A child between the ages of 2 and 5. Children, Preschool,Preschool Child,Preschool Children
D002760 Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde Fiberoptic endoscopy designed for duodenal observation and cannulation of VATER'S AMPULLA, in order to visualize the pancreatic and biliary duct system by retrograde injection of contrast media. Endoscopic (Vater) papillotomy (SPHINCTEROTOMY, ENDOSCOPIC) may be performed during this procedure. ERCP,Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography,Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic,Cholangiopancreatographies, Endoscopic Retrograde,Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographies,Retrograde Cholangiopancreatographies, Endoscopic

Related Publications

R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
April 1998, Gastroenterologia y hepatologia,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
February 1999, Gastrointestinal endoscopy,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
December 1997, Gastrointestinal endoscopy,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
April 2017, Mymensingh medical journal : MMJ,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
March 2004, Orvosi hetilap,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
July 2019, Abdominal radiology (New York),
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
May 1999, RoFo : Fortschritte auf dem Gebiete der Rontgenstrahlen und der Nuklearmedizin,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
November 1998, Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
January 2002, Medicinski arhiv,
R E Hintze, and A Adler, and W Veltzke, and H Abou-Rebyeh, and R Hammerstingl, and T Vogl, and R Felix
February 1982, Journal of the Tennessee Medical Association,
Copied contents to your clipboard!