Solid extratesticular masses evaluated with sonography: pathologic correlation. 1997

M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

OBJECTIVE To determine if the sonographic appearance of solid extratesticular masses enables distinction of benign from malignant disease. METHODS Sonograms of 19 patients with palpable testicular masses who underwent biopsy were reviewed retrospectively. Appearances of masses on sonograms were correlated with pathologic diagnoses. RESULTS All masses were well defined and ranged in size from 5.7 to 66.7 mm (mean, 21 mm). On the sonograms, five masses were within the epididymis, and six were distinct from it; seven cases were indeterminate. The epididymis was surgically absent in the remaining patient. Sonographic echogenicity ranged from hypoechoic to hyperechoic relative to that of the testis. At pathologic evaluation, there were 16 (84%) benign and three (16%) malignant lesions. Benign lesions consisted of six adenomatoid tumors, two lipomas, two epidermoid inclusion cysts, two cases of sarcoidosis, and one case each of sperm granuloma, spermatic cord leiomyoma, benign inflammatory nodule, and fibroma. The malignant lesions consisted of scrotal wall liposarcoma, epididymal leiomyosarcoma, and recurrent spindle cell malignancy of the spermatic cord. No sonographic features of masses were useful for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions. CONCLUSIONS The frequency of malignancy (16%) contrasts with prior reports that suggest a very low rate of malignancy among these masses. Sonography is useful for identifying the extratesticular location of a mass but not for distinguishing the nature of the lesion.

UI MeSH Term Description Entries
D008297 Male Males
D008875 Middle Aged An adult aged 45 - 64 years. Middle Age
D011300 Preoperative Care Care given during the period prior to undergoing surgery when psychological and physical preparations are made according to the special needs of the individual patient. This period spans the time between admission to the hospital to the time the surgery begins. (From Dictionary of Health Services Management, 2d ed) Care, Preoperative,Preoperative Procedure,Preoperative Procedures,Procedure, Preoperative,Procedures, Preoperative
D003937 Diagnosis, Differential Determination of which one of two or more diseases or conditions a patient is suffering from by systematically comparing and contrasting results of diagnostic measures. Diagnoses, Differential,Differential Diagnoses,Differential Diagnosis
D006801 Humans Members of the species Homo sapiens. Homo sapiens,Man (Taxonomy),Human,Man, Modern,Modern Man
D000328 Adult A person having attained full growth or maturity. Adults are of 19 through 44 years of age. For a person between 19 and 24 years of age, YOUNG ADULT is available. Adults
D000368 Aged A person 65 years of age or older. For a person older than 79 years, AGED, 80 AND OVER is available. Elderly
D001706 Biopsy Removal and pathologic examination of specimens from the living body. Biopsies
D012189 Retrospective Studies Studies used to test etiologic hypotheses in which inferences about an exposure to putative causal factors are derived from data relating to characteristics of persons under study or to events or experiences in their past. The essential feature is that some of the persons under study have the disease or outcome of interest and their characteristics are compared with those of unaffected persons. Retrospective Study,Studies, Retrospective,Study, Retrospective
D012680 Sensitivity and Specificity Binary classification measures to assess test results. Sensitivity or recall rate is the proportion of true positives. Specificity is the probability of correctly determining the absence of a condition. (From Last, Dictionary of Epidemiology, 2d ed) Specificity,Sensitivity,Specificity and Sensitivity

Related Publications

M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
February 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
January 1998, Radiology,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
January 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
August 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
January 1989, Urologic radiology,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
May 2023, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
November 1990, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
October 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
February 2008, European radiology,
M C Frates, and C B Benson, and D N DiSalvo, and D L Brown, and F C Laing, and P M Doubilet
February 2006, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine,
Copied contents to your clipboard!